Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(3):e59221.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059221. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

Automated universal BRAF state detection within the activation segment in skin metastases by pyrosequencing-based assay U-BRAF(V600)

Affiliations

Automated universal BRAF state detection within the activation segment in skin metastases by pyrosequencing-based assay U-BRAF(V600)

Alexander Skorokhod et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Malignant melanoma is a highly-aggressive type of malignancy with considerable metastatic potential and frequent resistance to cytotoxic agents. BRAF mutant protein was recently recognized as therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma. We present a newly-developed U-BRAF(V600) approach - a universal pyrosequencing-based assay for mutation detection within activation segment in exon 15 of human braf. We identified 5 different BRAF mutations in a single assay analyzing 75 different formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of cutaneous melanoma metastases from 29 patients. We found BRAF mutations in 21 of 29 metastases. All mutant variants were quantitatively detectable by the newly-developed U-BRAF(V600) assay. These results were confirmed by ultra-deep-sequencing validation ((~)60,000-fold coverage). In contrast to all other BRAF state detection methods, the U-BRAF(V600) assay is capable of automated quantitative identification of at least 36 previously-published BRAF mutations. Under the precaution of a minimum of 3% mutated cells in front of a background of wild type cells, U-BRAFV600 assay design completely excludes false wild-type results. The corresponding algorithm for classification of BRAF-mutated variants is provided. The single-reaction assay and data analysis automation makes our approach suitable for the assessment of large clinical sample sizes. Therefore, we suggest U-BRAF(V600) assay as a most powerful sequencing-based diagnostic tool to automatically identify BRAF state as a prerequisite to targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: AS declares an inventorship of U-BRAF-V600 assay, a patent for diagnostic application of U-BRAF-V600 is pending. Application Number: EP 12 153 477.0. Filling date: 1st February 2012. Title: Method for variant differentiation utilizing a pyrosequencing dispensation order. State: Pending application. Herewith AS confirms that this patent does not alter his adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. BRAF mutation analysis by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing-based assay U-BRAFV600.
(a) Sanger sequencing; (b) pyrosequencing-based assay U-BRAFV600. “+” indicates the positive peaks of the dispensation nucleotides within recognition patterns of U-BRAFV600 assay. mt – mutant; wt – wild-type. Recognition patterns are shown in black boxes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Low-abundance BRAF mutations.
a) Pyrogram of cloned wild-type BRAF. Red arrow indicates the reduction of peak intensity values; b) pyrograms of cloned BRAF mutants. Red asterisks indicate the dispensation nucleotide’s peaks, which are characteristic for corresponding BRAF mutant in low-copy-number analysis; c) pyrograms of premixed BRAF mutants with wild type. Red arrows indicate the tendency of peak-pairs’ difference included in low-copy-number analysis. Red asterisks indicate the peaks with the contribution of correspondent mutant nucleotides shown in (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dispensation order for 5 mutated BRAF variants detected by U-BRAFV600 assay.
*A5 = Awt +3Amt. Recognition patters are indicated in black boxes, individual mutation features are marked in grey boxes dispensation order’s nucleotides, which are involved into mt:wt ratio, are bolded.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Algorithm for automated BRAF state classification of U-BRAFV600 pyrosequencing data analysis.
Reduction factors for both A-peak and dispensation steps should be taken into consideration calculating individual peak intensities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, Thompson JF, Atkins MB, et al. (2009) Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 27: 6199–6206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Choi JW, Kim YS (2011) Frequencies of BRAF and NRAS mutations are different in histological types and sites of origin of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 164: 776–784. - PubMed
    1. Miller AJ, Mihm MC Jr (2006) Melanoma. N Engl J Med 355: 51–65. - PubMed
    1. Ellerhorst JA, Greene VR, Ekmekcioglu S, Warneke CL, Johnson MM, et al. (2011) Clinical correlates of NRAS and BRAF mutations in primary human melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 17: 229–235. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, et al. (2002) Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417: 949–954. - PubMed

Publication types