Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(3):e59424.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059424. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae

Affiliations

Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae

Nathan F Bendik et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Despite recognition that nearly one-third of the 6300 amphibian species are threatened with extinction, our understanding of the general ecology and population status of many amphibians is relatively poor. A widely-used method for monitoring amphibians involves injecting captured individuals with unique combinations of colored visible implant elastomer (VIE). We compared VIE identification to a less-invasive method - computer-assisted photographic identification (photoID) - in endangered Jollyville Plateau salamanders (Eurycea tonkawae), a species with a known range limited to eight stream drainages in central Texas. We based photoID on the unique pigmentation patterns on the dorsal head region of 1215 individual salamanders using identification software Wild-ID. We compared the performance of photoID methods to VIEs using both 'high-quality' and 'low-quality' images, which were taken using two different camera types and technologies. For high-quality images, the photoID method had a false rejection rate of 0.76% compared to 1.90% for VIEs. Using a comparable dataset of lower-quality images, the false rejection rate was much higher (15.9%). Photo matching scores were negatively correlated with time between captures, suggesting that evolving natural marks could increase misidentification rates in longer term capture-recapture studies. Our study demonstrates the utility of large-scale capture-recapture using photo identification methods for Eurycea and other species with stable natural marks that can be reliably photographed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Head pattern recognition in Eurycea tonkawae.
Pair of images from (A) two different individuals and (B) the same individual one year apart. Lines connect matching SIFT features.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Diagram of the two-step image-matching process.
Image pairs above the score threshold of 0.1 were considered matches (criterion 1). The top 100 first-ranked image pairs below 0.1 were compared by eye.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Similarity scores and matching success.
Frequency of similarity scores for image pairs from different (black) and the same individuals (grey) from the high-quality dataset. Inset shows the lower range of similarity scores for top ranked image pairs only. The shaded region between dashed lines (2) indicates the range (similarity scores: 0.017–0.1) in which we visually (by-eye) compared 100 potential matching pairs. Similarity scores above this range (3) always involved photo pairs from the same individuals (according to VIE tags). Below this range (1), all but one photo pair came from non-matching individuals (according to VIE tags).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of time on similarity score.
Similarity scores versus days between photo captures of the same individual for (A) low-quality (n = 896) and (B) high-quality photos (n = 1090). Tables.

References

    1. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, et al. (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783–1786 doi:10.1126/science.1103538 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wake DB, Vredenburg VT (2008) Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11466–11473 doi:10.1073/pnas.0801921105 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lips KR, Brem F, Brenes R, Reeve JD, Alford RA, et al. (2006) Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 3165–3170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Manly BFJ (2010) Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 335 p.
    1. Bailey LL (2004) Evaluating elastomer marking and photo identification methods for terrestrial salamanders: Marking effects and observer bias. Herpetol Rev 35: 38–41.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources