Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: a qualitative study
- PMID: 23559079
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2896-x
Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: a qualitative study
Abstract
Purpose: Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology.
Methods: Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts.
Results: Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment-workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences-of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes-investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family-hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation.
Conclusions: We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.
Similar articles
-
Swedish intensivists' experiences and attitudes regarding end-of-life decisions.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 May;64(5):656-662. doi: 10.1111/aas.13549. Epub 2020 Jan 29. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31954072
-
Nurse's, physician's and family member's experiences of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment process in an intensive care unit.J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4827-4842. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16556. Epub 2022 Oct 10. J Clin Nurs. 2023. PMID: 36217241
-
'Implicit rationing of nursing care processes'-Decision-making in ICU nurses' experiences: A qualitative study.Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13127. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13127. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Nurs Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 39011651
-
Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review.Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):550-557. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 30688716 Review.
-
End-of-life decisions in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) - Exploring the experiences of ICU nurses and doctors - A critical literature review.Aust Crit Care. 2016 May;29(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Sep 19. Aust Crit Care. 2016. PMID: 26388551 Review.
Cited by
-
Withholding or withdrawal of treatment under French rules: a study performed in 43 intensive care units.Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0056-x. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Ann Intensive Care. 2015. PMID: 26092498 Free PMC article.
-
Decision Aids and Shared Decision-Making in Neurocritical Care: An Unmet Need in Our NeuroICUs.Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):127-30. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0097-2. Neurocrit Care. 2015. PMID: 25561435 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative exploration of the discharge process and factors predisposing to readmissions to the intensive care unit.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2821-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29304857 Free PMC article.
-
Early Withdrawal Decision-Making in Patients with Coma After Cardiac Arrest: A Qualitative Study of Intensive Care Clinicians.Neurocrit Care. 2016 Oct;25(2):258-65. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0275-5. Neurocrit Care. 2016. PMID: 27112149
-
Physicians' decision-making when managing pediatric patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: A qualitative study.Eur J Neurol. 2022 Aug;29(8):2181-2191. doi: 10.1111/ene.15354. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Eur J Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35398947 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources