Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;38(1):22-6.
doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.106623.

Validity and Reliability of MOS Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for Use in India

Richa Sinha  1 , Wim J A van den Heuvel, Perianayagam Arokiasamy
Affiliations

Validity and Reliability of MOS Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for Use in India

Richa Sinha et al. Indian J Community Med. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Health is defined as the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being than just the absence of disease or infirmity. In order to measure health in the community, a reliable and validated instrument is required.

Objectives: To adapt and translate the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) for use in India, to study its validity and reliability and to explore its higher order factor structure.

Materials and methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted in 184 adult subjects by two trained interviewers. Statistical analyses for establishing item-level validity, scale-level validity and reliability and tests of known group comparison were performed. The higher order factor structure was investigated using principal component analysis with varimax rotation.

Results: The questionnaire was well understood by the respondents. Item-level validity was established using tests of item internal consistency, equality of item-scale correlations and item-discriminant validity. Tests of scale-level validity and reliability performed well as all the scales met the required internal consistency criteria. Tests of known group comparison discriminated well across groups differing in socio-demographic and clinical variables. The higher order factor structure was found to comprise of two factors, with factor loadings being similar to those observed in other Asian countries.

Conclusion: The item-and scale-level statistical analyses supported the validity and reliability of SF-36 for use in India.

Keywords: Health surveys; quality of life; questionnaires; reliability; translations; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Handbook of basic documents. 46th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; World Health Organization.
    1. Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singapore Med J. 2001;42:131–5. - PubMed
    1. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:441–9. - PubMed
    1. McDowell I. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc; 2006. General health status and quality of life; pp. 520–703.
    1. Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:925–32. - PubMed