Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening
- PMID: 23561631
- PMCID: PMC4010151
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.025
Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening
Abstract
Breast cancer screening remains a subject of intense and, at times, passionate debate. Mammography has long been the mainstay of breast cancer detection and is the only screening test proven to reduce mortality. Although it remains the gold standard of breast cancer screening, there is increasing awareness of subpopulations of women for whom mammography has reduced sensitivity. Mammography also has undergone increased scrutiny for false positives and excessive biopsies, which increase radiation dose, cost, and patient anxiety. In response to these challenges, new technologies for breast cancer screening have been developed, including low-dose mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, tomosynthesis, automated whole breast ultrasound, molecular imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Here we examine some of the current controversies and promising new technologies that may improve detection of breast cancer both in the general population and in high-risk groups, such as women with dense breasts. We propose that optimal breast cancer screening will ultimately require a personalized approach based on metrics of cancer risk with selective application of specific screening technologies best suited to the individual's age, risk, and breast density.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures





Comment in
-
Breast cancer screening: the paradigm shifts (finally).Am J Med. 2013 Jun;126(6):465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Am J Med. 2013. PMID: 23561630 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Eur J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30316869
-
Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?Clin Imaging. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Clin Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26093511
-
[New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].Magy Onkol. 2015 Mar;59(1):44-55. Epub 2014 Oct 13. Magy Onkol. 2015. PMID: 25763913 Review. Hungarian.
-
Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.Ultrasound Q. 2011 Mar;27(1):23-47. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31820e15ac. Ultrasound Q. 2011. PMID: 21343800 Review.
-
Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.Radiol Manage. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. Radiol Manage. 2004. PMID: 15377106
Cited by
-
Automated quality assessment in three-dimensional breast ultrasound images.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Apr;3(2):027002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.2.027002. Epub 2016 Apr 25. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016. PMID: 27158633 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a microRNA Panel for Classification of Abnormal Mammograms for Breast Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;13(9):2130. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092130. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33925125 Free PMC article.
-
Recent progress in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy detection of biomarkers in liquid biopsy for breast cancer.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 8;14:1400498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1400498. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39040452 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patchless Multi-Stage Transfer Learning for Improved Mammographic Breast Mass Classification.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 1;14(5):1280. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051280. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35267587 Free PMC article.
-
Main controversies in breast cancer.World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):359-73. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359. World J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25114851 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kuhl CK, Kuhn W, Schild H. Management of women at high risk for breast cancer: new imaging beyond mammography. Breast. 2005;14(6):480–6. - PubMed
-
- Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225(1):165–75. - PubMed
-
- Mendelson G, Aronow WS. Underutilization of measurement of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and of lipid-lowering therapy in older patients with manifest atherosclerotic disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1998;46(9):1128–31. - PubMed
-
- Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M. Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2001;70(2):145–53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical