Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;63(607):e97-103.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X663055.

Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?

Una Martin et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Br J Gen Pract. 2013 May;63(610):240

Abstract

Background: Inter-arm difference in blood pressure of >10 mmHg is associated with peripheral vascular disease, but it is unclear how much of the difference in sequential right and left arm blood pressure measurements might be due to a 'white-coat' effect.

Aim: To use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to better understand the clinical significance of inter-arm differences in blood pressure.

Design and setting: Retrospective study in a teaching hospital in Birmingham.

Method: Anonymised clinical data collected from 784 patients attending a single hospital-based hypertension clinic were retrospectively analysed. Each participant had blood pressure measured sequentially in both arms, followed by ABPM over the subsequent 24 hours.

Result: Data were available for 710 (91%) patients, of whom 39.3% (279) had a blood pressure difference of 10 mmHg or more between each arm. Compared to daytime systolic ABPM, the difference was 25.1 mmHg using the arm with the highest reading, but only 15.5 mmHg if the lower reading was taken (mean difference 9.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.0 mmHg to 10.3 mmHg)). However, differences between mean right (20.7 mmHg) or left (19.9 mmHg) arm blood pressure and daytime systolic ABPM were very similar.

Conclusion: Compared with ABPM, use of the higher of the left and right arm readings measured sequentially appears to overestimate true mean blood pressure. As there is no significant difference in the extent of disparity with ABPM by left or right arm, this is unlikely to be due to arm dominance and may be due to the 'white-coat' effect reducing blood pressure on repeated measurement. Where a large inter-arm blood pressure difference is detected with sequential measurement, healthcare professionals should re-measure the blood pressure in the original arm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modified Bland-Altman plot of systolic blood pressure measured on the right arm minus mean daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure versus mean daytime ABPM systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modified Bland-Altman plot of systolic blood pressure measured on the left arm minus mean daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure versus mean daytime ABPM systolic blood pressure.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams B, Poulter N, Brown M, et al. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens. 2004;18(3):139–185. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Hypertension: management of hypertension in adults in primary care. Clinical guideline 127. London: NICE; 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127/NICEGuidance (accessed 4 Dec 2012)
    1. Parker E, Glasziou P. Use of evidence in hypertension guidelines: should we measure in both arms? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(560):e87–e92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heneghan C, Perera R, Mant D, Glasziou P. Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(545):948–952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasziou P. How much monitoring? Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(538):350–351. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources