Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Feb;63(607):e134-40.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X663091.

Quality-assured screening for diabetic retinopathy delivered in primary care in Ireland: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Quality-assured screening for diabetic retinopathy delivered in primary care in Ireland: an observational study

Sheena McHugh et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: At present, there is no national population-based retinopathy screening programme for people in Ireland who have diabetes, such as those operating in the UK for over a decade.

Aim: To evaluate a community-based initiative that utilised existing resources in general practice and community optometry/ophthalmology services to provide screening for diabetic retinopathy.

Design and setting: Cross-sectional study using electronic ophthalmic patient screening records in community optometry clinics in Cork, Ireland.

Method: A purposive sample of 32 practices was recruited from Diabetes in General Practice, a general practice-led initiative in the South of Ireland. Practices invited all adult patients registered with diabetes to participate in free retinopathy screening (n = 3598), provided by 15 community optometry practices and two community ophthalmologists. Data were recorded on an electronic database used by optometrists and the performance was benchmarked against proposed national standards for retinopathy screening.

Result: In total, 30 practices participated (94%). After 6 months, 49% of patients (n = 1763) had been screened, following one invitation letter and no reminder. Forty-three per cent of those invited consented to their data being used in the study and subsequent analyses are based on that sample (n = 1542). The mean age of the patients screened was 65 years (standard deviation = 13.0 years), 57% were male (n = 884), and 86% had type 2 diabetes (n = 1320). In total, 26% had some level of retinopathy detected (n = 395); 21% had background retinopathy (n = 331), 3% had pre-proliferative retinopathy (n = 53), and 0.7% had proliferative retinopathy (n = 11).

Conclusion: The detection of retinopathy among 26% of those screened highlights the need for a national retinopathy screening programme in Ireland. Significant learning, derived from the implementation of this initiative, will inform the national programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient care pathway adapted from the proposed national framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of sample invited, screened, and consented, and the level of retinopathy detected. SD = standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Consultation waiting times for the newly referred patients requiring a consultation within 13 weeks (n = 53), based on hospital data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jönsson B. Revealing the cost of type II diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):5–12. - PubMed
    1. Williams R, Van Gaal L, Lucioni C. Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of Type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):13–17. - PubMed
    1. Ockrim Z, Yorston D. Managing diabetic retinopathy. BMJ. 2010;341:c5400. - PubMed
    1. Ghafour IM, Allan D, Foulds WS. Common causes of blindness and visual handicap in the west of Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67(4):209–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Congdon NG, Friedman DS, Lietman T. Important causes of visual impairment in the world today. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2057–2060. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources