Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
- PMID: 23562817
- PMCID: PMC3641498
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653
Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
Abstract
Background: Transitions of care between providers are vulnerable periods in healthcare delivery that expose patients to preventable errors and adverse events. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a medical or surgical hospital ward is one of the most challenging and high risk transitions of care. Approximately 1 in 12 patients discharged will be readmitted to ICU or die before leaving the hospital. Many more patients are exposed to unnecessary healthcare, adverse events and/or are disappointed with the quality of their care. Our objective is to conduct a scoping review by systematically searching the literature to identify ICU discharge planning tools and their supporting evidence-base including barriers and facilitators to their use.
Methods and analysis: Systematic searching of the published health literature will be conducted to identify the existing ICU discharge planning tools and supporting evidence. Literature (research and non-research) reporting on the tools used to facilitate decision making and/or communication at ICU discharge with patients of any age will be included. Outcomes will include adverse events and provider and patient/family-reported outcomes. Two investigators will independently review the abstracts (screen 1) to identify those meeting the inclusion criteria and then independently assess the full text articles (screen 2) to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. Data collection will include information on citations and identified tools. A quality assessment will be performed on original research studies. A descriptive summary will be developed for each tool.
Ethics and dissemination: Our scoping review will synthesise the literature for ICU discharge planning tools and identify the opportunities for knowledge to action and gaps in evidence where primary evidence is necessary. This will serve as the foundational element in a multistep research programme to standardise and improve the quality of care provided to patients during ICU discharge. Ethics approval is not required for this study.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Patient discharge from intensive care: an updated scoping review to identify tools and practices to inform high-quality care.Crit Care. 2021 Dec 17;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03857-2. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34920729 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review protocol to map the use of text-based two-way communication between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e062087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062087. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36137634 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of an Electronic Communication Tool on Transitions in Care From the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol for a Cluster-Specific Pre-Post Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 8;10(1):e18675. doi: 10.2196/18675. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 33416509 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of patient discharge from intensive care: opportunities and tools to improve care.Chest. 2015 Feb;147(2):317-327. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2965. Chest. 2015. PMID: 25210942
Cited by
-
Ward Capacity Strain: A Novel Predictor of Delays in Intensive Care Unit Survivor Throughput.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Mar;16(3):387-390. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-621RL. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019. PMID: 30407847 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Research trends in readiness for hospital discharge between 2002 and 2021: A bibliometric analysis.Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7676-7693. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2009. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Nurs Open. 2023. PMID: 37775985 Free PMC article.
-
The family experiences of in-hospital care questionnaire in severe traumatic brain injury (FECQ-TBI): a validation study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 28;16(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1884-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27894286 Free PMC article.
-
Improving clinical handover between intensive care unit and general ward professionals at intensive care unit discharge.Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):589-604. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3666-8. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Intensive Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25672275 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A phenomenological study on the experiences of patient transfer from the intensive care unit to general wards.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0254316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254316. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34234351 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Horwitz LI, Krumholz HM, Green ML, et al. Transfers of patient care between house staff on internal medicine wards: a national survey. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1173–7 - PubMed
-
- Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O'Neil AC, et al. Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med 1994;121:866–72 - PubMed
-
- Canadian Council on Health Service Accreditation. CCHSA patient/client safety goals and required organizational goals: evaluation of implementation and evidence of compliance. Version of 2.1 for use with 2007 standard. http://www.accreditation.ca/uploadedFiles/CHAR-2012-en.pdf (accessed 12 Mar 2012)
-
- Coleman EA, Berenson RA. Lost in transition: challenges and opportunities for improving the quality of transitional care. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:533–6 - PubMed
-
- Patterson ES, Roth EM, Woods DD, et al. Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:125–32 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources