Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2253-2261.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.056. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction

Affiliations

Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction

Margaret S Kim et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and its modified versions, which are established measures of liver dysfunction, as a tool to assess heart transplantation (HTx) urgency in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

Background: Liver abnormalities have a prognostic impact on the outcome of patients with advanced heart failure.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 343 patients undergoing HTx evaluation between 2005 and 2009. The prognostic effectiveness of MELD and 2 modifications (MELDNa [includes serum sodium levels] and MELD-XI [does not include international normalized ratio]) for endpoint events, defined as death/HTx/ventricular assist device requirement, was evaluated in our cohort and in subgroups of patients on and off oral anticoagulation.

Results: The MELD and MELDNa scores were excellent predictors for 1-year endpoint events (areas under the curve: 0.71 and 0.73, respectively). High scores (>12) were strongly associated with poor survival at 1 year (MELD 69.3% vs. 90.4% [p < 0.0001]; MELDNa 70.4% vs. 96.9% [p < 0.0001]). Increased scores were associated with increased risk for HTx (hazard ratio: 1.10 [95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.14]; p < 0.0001 for both scores), which was independent of other known risk factors (MELD p = 0.0055; MELDNa p = 0.0083). Anticoagulant use was associated with poor survival at 1 year (73.7% vs. 86.4%; p = 0.0118), and the statistical significance of MELD/MELDNa was higher in patients not receiving oral anticoagulation therapy. MELD-XI was a fair but limited predictor of the endpoint events in patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusions: Assessment of liver dysfunction according to the MELD scoring system provides additional risk information in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves of All Patients (N = 260) Dichotomized According to MELD Values
Data were dichotomized according to (A) Model for End-Stage Liver Dysfunction (MELD); (B) MELD serum sodium score (MELDNa); and (C) MELD without international normalized ratio score (MELD-XI) by using the average cutoff value (12) derived from the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for 1-year death/heart transplantation (HTx)/ventricular assist device requirement. The survivals are represented by the solid red line for patients with low scores (<12) and the solid blue line for patients with high scores (>12). The p values obtained by the log-rank test were (A) p < 0.0001, (B) p < 0.0001, and (C) p < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve of All Patients (N = 260) Stratified According to Anticoagulation Use
The survivals are represented by the solid red line for patients not undergoing anticoagulation treatment (n = 156) and the solid blue line for patients receiving anticoagulation (n = 104). *Statistically significant (log rank test). HTx = heart transplantation.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves of Patients Off and On Anticoagulation
Values given for patients off anticoagulation (n = 156; top) and on anticoagulation (n = 104; bottom) further dichotomized by MELD (left), MELDNa (middle), and MELD-XI (right) scores by using the cutoff value of 12. The survivals are represented by the solid red line for patients with low scores (<12) and the solid blue line for patients with high scores (>12). The p value obtained by using the log-rank test in patients off anticoagulation was (A) p < 0.0001, (B) p = 0.0004, and (C) p = 0.0006. The p value obtained by using the log-rank test in patients on anticoagulation was (D) p = 0.5300, (E) p = 0.3236, and (F) p = 0.0136. *Statistically significant (log rank test). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

Comment in

References

    1. Mancini DM, Eisen H, Kussmanul W, Mull R, Edmunds LH, Wilson JR. Value of peak exercise oxygen consumption for optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1991;83:778–86. - PubMed
    1. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95:2660–7. - PubMed
    1. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113:1424–33. - PubMed
    1. van Deursen VM, Damman K, Hillege HL, et al. Abnormal liver function in relation to hemodynamic profile in heart failure patients. J Card Fail. 2010;16:84–90. - PubMed
    1. Poelzl G, Ess M, Mussner-Seeber C, Pachinger O, Frick M, Ulmer H. Liver dysfunction in chronic heart failure: prevalence, characteristic and prognostic significance. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:153–63. - PubMed

MeSH terms