Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;44(3):305-12.
doi: 10.1007/s12029-013-9493-7.

A population-based comparison of overall and disease-specific survival following local excision or abdominoperineal resection for stage I rectal adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A population-based comparison of overall and disease-specific survival following local excision or abdominoperineal resection for stage I rectal adenocarcinoma

Michelle Olsheski et al. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The use of local excision (LE) for early stage rectal adenocarcinoma is increasing due to the associated morbidity of radical resection. To determine if survival in stage I rectal cancer differs following LE or abdominoperineal resection (APR), we analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.

Material and methods: We selected patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002 with T1-2N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma measuring ≤4 cm who underwent either local excision with (LE + RT) or without adjuvant radiation (LE alone) or APR alone. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was also performed to determine the effect of covariates on OS and DSS.

Results: A total of 2,391 patients were identified including 981 (41 %) treated with APR, 1,018 (43 %) treated with LE alone, and 392 (16 %) treated with LE + RT. With a median follow-up of 69 months, there was no difference in OS or DSS seen between the three groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). When stratifying by T-stage, there was a significant difference in overall survival between LE alone and APR for T2 disease. However, there was no difference in DSS between these two subgroups. There were no other significant survival differences between all comparable subgroups.

Conclusions: In this large population-based study, there was no difference in long-term DSS between patients who underwent an APR compared to selected patients who underwent LE with or without adjuvant radiation. Although these data further reinforce the promising data regarding the selected use of LE, further prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the role of LE in this setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):894-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):384-91 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1999 Jul;230(1):49-54 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1991 Feb 15;67(4):908-14 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jan 15;46(2):313-22 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources