Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jun 1;119(11):2067-73.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.27981. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Patient-physician communication about code status preferences: a randomized controlled trial

Wadih Rhondali  1 , Pedro Perez-Cruz, David Hui, Gary B Chisholm, Shalini Dalal, Walter Baile, Eva Chittenden, Eduardo Bruera
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient-physician communication about code status preferences: a randomized controlled trial

Wadih Rhondali et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Code status discussions are important in cancer care, but the best modality for such discussions has not been established. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a physician ending a code status discussion with a question (autonomy approach) versus a recommendation (beneficence approach) on patients' do-not-resuscitate (DNR) preference.

Methods: Patients in a supportive care clinic watched 2 videos showing a physician-patient discussion regarding code status. Both videos were identical except for the ending: one ended with the physician asking for the patient's code status preference and the other with the physician recommending DNR. Patients were randomly assigned to watch the videos in different sequences. The main outcome was the proportion of patients choosing DNR for the video patient.

Results: A total of 78 patients completed the study, and 74% chose DNR after the question video, whereas 73% chose DNR after the recommendation video. Median physician compassion score was very high and not different for both videos. All 30 of 30 patients who had chosen DNR for themselves and 30 of 48 patients who had not chosen DNR for themselves chose DNR for the video patient (100% versus 62%). Age (odds ratio = 1.1/year) and white ethnicity (odds ratio = 9.43) predicted DNR choice for the video patient.

Conclusions: Ending DNR discussions with a question or a recommendation did not impact DNR choice or perception of physician compassion. Therefore, both approaches are clinically appropriate. All patients who chose DNR for themselves and most patients who did not choose DNR for themselves chose DNR for the video patient. Age and race predicted DNR choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort diagram of study process and participants' flow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Code status discussion: just have one.
    Pentz RD, Flamm AL. Pentz RD, et al. Cancer. 2013 Jun 1;119(11):1938-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27983. Epub 2013 Apr 5. Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23564437 No abstract available.

References

    1. Reisfield GM, Wallace SK, Munsell MF, Webb FJ, Alvarez ER, Wilson GR. Survival in cancer patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2006;71:152–160. - PubMed
    1. Ardagh M. Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine. J Med Ethics. 2000;26:396–399. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–994. - PubMed
    1. Embriaco N, Papazian L, Kentish-Barnes N, Pochard F, Azoulay E. Burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:482–488. - PubMed
    1. Fu S, Hong DS, Naing A, et al. Outcome analyses after the first admission to an intensive care unit in patients with advanced cancer referred to a phase I clinical trials program. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3547–3552. - PubMed

Publication types