Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):806-13.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001628. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge

Affiliations
Review

Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge

Weiyi Sun et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: The Sixth Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) Natural Language Processing Challenge for Clinical Records focused on the temporal relations in clinical narratives. The organizers provided the research community with a corpus of discharge summaries annotated with temporal information, to be used for the development and evaluation of temporal reasoning systems. 18 teams from around the world participated in the challenge. During the workshop, participating teams presented comprehensive reviews and analysis of their systems, and outlined future research directions suggested by the challenge contributions.

Methods: The challenge evaluated systems on the information extraction tasks that targeted: (1) clinically significant events, including both clinical concepts such as problems, tests, treatments, and clinical departments, and events relevant to the patient's clinical timeline, such as admissions, transfers between departments, etc; (2) temporal expressions, referring to the dates, times, durations, or frequencies phrases in the clinical text. The values of the extracted temporal expressions had to be normalized to an ISO specification standard; and (3) temporal relations, between the clinical events and temporal expressions. Participants determined pairs of events and temporal expressions that exhibited a temporal relation, and identified the temporal relation between them.

Results: For event detection, statistical machine learning (ML) methods consistently showed superior performance. While ML and rule based methods seemed to detect temporal expressions equally well, the best systems overwhelmingly adopted a rule based approach for value normalization. For temporal relation classification, the systems using hybrid approaches that combined ML and heuristics based methods produced the best results.

Keywords: clinical language processing; medical language processing; natural language processing; sharedtask challenges; temporal reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
System result analysis. (A) EVENT distribution. (B) EVENT type distribution. (C) TIMEX distribution. (D) TIMEX type distribution. (E) Timex distribution. (F) Timex type distribution.

References

    1. Harkema H, Setzer A, Gaizauskas R, et al. Mining and modelling temporal clinical data. Nottingham, UK: Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Vol 2005; 2005:507–14
    1. Zhou L, Melton GB, Parsons S, et al. A temporal constraint structure for extracting temporal information from clinical narrative. J Biomedical Inform 2006;39: 424–39 - PubMed
    1. Savova G, Bethard S, Styler W, et al. Towards temporal relation discovery from the clinical narrative. San Francisco, CA, USA: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Vol 2009 American Medical Informatics Association, 2009:568 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uzuner Ö, Luo Y, Szolovits P. Evaluating the state-of-the-art in automatic de-identification. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:550–63 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uzuner Ö, Goldstein I, Luo Y, et al. Identifying patient smoking status from medical discharge records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:14–24 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types