Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 8;3(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-10.

Short term cost effectiveness of a regional myocardial infarction network

Affiliations

Short term cost effectiveness of a regional myocardial infarction network

Ralf Birkemeyer et al. Health Econ Rev. .

Abstract

Aims: Myocardial infarction networks have been shown to improve guideline adherent therapy and outcomes in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our objective was to assess the short term cost effectiveness of a network structure.

Methods and results: Outcome data and reimbursement data for the index hospital stay were gathered in consecutive patients with acute STEMI (n = 536) admitted to any of the hospitals in a 350.000 inhabitant rural network area during the years 2002 (n = 185), 2005 (n = 163) and 2008 (n = 188). Network structure was established between 2002 and 2005 aiming for identical treatment of all acute STEMI patients during 24 h/7d a week with primary angioplasty. Patient baseline characteristics in the different years were quite comparable. From 2002 to 2005 regional hospital mortality in STEMI patients decreased from 16% to 9%. Lower mortality under network conditions was confirmed in 2008. Reimbursement data of different years were standardized to exclude effects not induced by the network. The mean initial costs per saved live during the index stay were €7727 with a 95%-confidence interval of €-3.500 to €36.700 (referenced to the German reimbursement in 2005).

Conclusion: The short term cost effectiveness of a myocardial infarction network organisation is within well accepted boundaries under conditions of the German reimbursement system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of incremental costs per saved life during index stay (reference: 2005 reimbursement) for an emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting every patient to primary PCI; result of a bootstrap analysis with 5000 re-samplings.

References

    1. Birkemeyer R, Rillig A, Treusch F, Koch A, Miljak T, Meyerfeldt U, Kunze M, Jung W, Höher M. Abortion of myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty depends on preprocedural TIMI flow. EuroIntervention. 2011;3:854–859. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick H, Giannuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van‘t Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D. ESC guidelines fort he management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;3(20):2569–2619. - PubMed
    1. O‘Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz CB, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso JE, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;3(4):529–555. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? Am J Cardiol. 2003;3:824–826. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00891-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betriu A, Masotti M. Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutanneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis. Am J Cardiol. 2005;3:100–101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.069. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources