Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 8:8:68.
doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-68.

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Torsten Christ et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Stentless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) became a common surgical procedure to treat aortic valve disease, as it offers larger orifice area and improved hemodynamics. The aim of our single-centre retrospective study was to assess long term results of first generation stentless aortic valves in young patients, where mechanical prostheses are considered first line therapy.

Methods: From 1993 to 2001, 188 (149 male and 39 female) patients (≤60 years) underwent SAVR. Indications were in 63.3% stenosis or mixed lesions and in 36.7% isolated regurgitation. Mean age of patients at surgery was 53.1 ± 7.1 years. Associated procedures were performed in 60 patients (31.9%). Follow-up data were acquired through telephone interviews. Follow-up was 90.4% complete at a mean of 8.8 ± 4.7 years. Total follow-up was 1657.6 patient-years with a maximum of 17 years.

Results: Overall hospital mortality was 3.2% (2.5% for isolated SAVR). Overall actuarial survival-rate at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 73.0% ± 3.5%/ 55.8% ± 5.4% and 81.0% ± 3.4%/ 58.0% ± 7.5%, respectively. For isolated SAVR, actuarial survival at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 70.1% ± 4.4%/ 64.1% ± 4.8% and 83.1% ± 4.0%/ 52.9% ± 9.0%, respectively. Reoperation was performed in 42 patients (22.3%) due to structural valve deterioration and endocarditis. Age (≤50 years) and associated procedures did not significantly lower survival and freedom from reoperation, however, small prosthesis sizes (≤25 mm) did.

Conclusion: In patients aged 60 and younger, SAVR provides reliable long-term results especially for larger aortic valves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival after SAVR (Impact of left ventricular function and size of SAVR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Freedom from Reoperation (Impact of prosthesis-diameter and patients age).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival after SAVR compared to general population.

References

    1. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, Feindel CM. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2180–2185. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.055. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, De Belder MA, Hunter S, Kendall S. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmann S, Walther T, Kempfert J, Leontjev S, Rastan A, Falk V. Stentless versus conventional xenograft aortic valve replacement: midterm results of a prospectively randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(2):467–472. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(22):2413–2426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):732–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources