Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013:8:159-67.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S40859. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

Effect of verapamil on systemic exposure and safety of umeclidinium and vilanterol: a randomized and open-label study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of verapamil on systemic exposure and safety of umeclidinium and vilanterol: a randomized and open-label study

Rashmi Mehta et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013.

Abstract

Background: The combination of umeclidinium (UMEC), a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist, and vilanterol (VI), a selective long-acting β₂ agonist, is in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of once-daily, inhaled UMEC and UMEC/VI when co-administered with oral verapamil, a moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor frequently used by patients with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities.

Methods: Subjects were randomized to one of two 13-day treatment regimens: UMEC 500 μg or UMEC 500 μg/VI 25 μg. All subjects received a single tablet containing 240 mg verapamil on each of days 9-13.

Results: Repeat doses of UMEC and UMEC/VI in combination with and without verapamil were safe and well tolerated. There was no increase in systemic exposure of UMEC when administered in combination with VI compared to UMEC alone. UMEC maximum concentration was similar with or without verapamil; a moderate increase in UMEC area under the curve (approximately 1.4-fold) was observed with verapamil. Verapamil did not increase systemic exposure to VI following administration of the UMEC/VI combination.

Conclusion: Administration of UMEC and UMEC/VI combination was well tolerated and did not show clinically relevant increases in systemic exposure for either drug. The UMEC/VI combination is unlikely to have a clinically meaningful drug-drug interaction with moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and CYP3A4 inhibitor drugs.

Keywords: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; long-acting β2 agonist; umeclidinium; verapamil; vilanterol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median plasma umeclidinium concentration-time semi-log plot at Day 8 (without verapamil) and Day 13 (with verapamil). (A) Umeclidinium treatment group; (B) Umeclidinium/vilanterol treatment group. Abbreviations: LLQ, lower limit of quantification; UMEC, umeclidinium; V, verapamil; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot of individual maximum (0–4 hours) heart rate versus log Cmax (by treatment). (A) Umeclidinium log Cmax; (B) Vilanterol log Cmax. Abbreviations: bpm, beats per minute; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; HR, heart rate; UMEC, umeclidinium; V, verapamil; VI, vilanterol.

References

    1. Fletcher MJ, Upton J, Taylor-Fishwick J, et al. COPD uncovered: an international survey on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] on a working age population. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:612. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mannino DM, Braman S. The epidemiology and economics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4(7):502–506. - PubMed
    1. Halbert RJ, Natoli JL, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist AS, Mannino DM. Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(3):523–532. - PubMed
    1. Ng TP, Niti M, Fones C, Yap KB, Tan WC. Co-morbid association of depression and COPD: a population-based study. Respir Med. 2009;103(6):895–901. - PubMed
    1. Foster TS, Miller JD, Marton JP, Caloyeras JP, Russell MW, Menzin J. Assessment of the economic burden of COPD in the US: a review and synthesis of the literature. COPD. 2006;3(4):211–218. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms