Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;4(3):ojphi.v4i3.4302.
doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v4i3.4302. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Understanding HMIS Implementation in a Developing Country Ministry of Health Context - an Institutional Logics Perspective

Ime Asangansi  1
Affiliations

Understanding HMIS Implementation in a Developing Country Ministry of Health Context - an Institutional Logics Perspective

Ime Asangansi. Online J Public Health Inform. 2012.

Abstract

Globally, health management information systems (HMIS) have been hailed as important tools for health reform (1). However, their implementation has become a major challenge for researchers and practitioners because of the significant proportion of failure of implementation efforts (2; 3). Researchers have attributed this significant failure of HMIS implementation, in part, to the complexity of meeting with and satisfying multiple (poorly understood) logics in the implementation process. This paper focuses on exploring the multiple logics, including how they may conflict and affect the HMIS implementation process. Particularly, I draw on an institutional logics perspective to analyze empirical findings from an action research project, which involved HMIS implementation in a state government Ministry of Health in (Northern) Nigeria. The analysis highlights the important HMIS institutional logics, where they conflict and how they are resolved. I argue for an expanded understanding of HMIS implementation that recognizes various institutional logics that participants bring to the implementation process, and how these are inscribed in the decision making process in ways that may be conflicting, and increasing the risk of failure. Furthermore, I propose that the resolution of conflicting logics can be conceptualized as involving deinstitutionalization, changeover resolution or dialectical resolution mechanisms. I conclude by suggesting that HMIS implementation can be improved by implementation strategies that are made based on an understanding of these conflicting logics.

Keywords: Legal and Social issues in Public Health Informatics; Ministry of Health; Nigeria; action research; change management; developing countries; health management information systems; institutional aspects of information systems; institutional logics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Components of an action research phase (34)
Figure 2
Figure 2
shows the architecture of the mobile data collection system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case dynamics matrix showing the dynamics of the case
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. AbouZahr C, Boerma T. Health information systems: the foundations of public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83(8):578–583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heeks R, Mundy D, Salazar A. Understanding success and failure of health care information systems. In: Armoni Adi., editor. Healthcare Information Systems: Challenges of the New Millennium. Idea Group Publishing; 2000. pp. 96–128.
    1. Heeks R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International journal of medical informatics. 2006;75(2):125–137. - PubMed
    1. Sahay S, Monteiro E, Aanestad M. Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2009;10(5):399–414.
    1. Reay T, Hinings CR. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies. 2009;30(6):629–652.

LinkOut - more resources