Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;2(5-6):187-94.
doi: 10.1177/2151458511426874.

Aspects of current management of distal radius fractures in the elderly individuals

Affiliations

Aspects of current management of distal radius fractures in the elderly individuals

Rohit Arora et al. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Diatal radius fractures (DRFs) are typical fractures of relatively fit persons with osteoporotic bone who remain active into older age. Traditionally, DRFs in older patients have been treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. Considering the increasing life expectancy of the elderly population, appropriate management of these fractures is of growing importance. Decision making for surgical or nonsurgical approach to osteoporotic DRFs is difficult. These decisions are often made based on the data from treatments of much younger patients. The current literature concerning the treatment of DRFs in the elderly individuals is more controversial. Some investigators have recommended open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) as treatment for unstable DRFs in older patients, while others have suggested that elderly patients should be treated nonsurgically even if there is an unstable fracture situation because fracture reduction is not associated with functional outcomes as in younger patients. This article reviews the different treatment options for DRFs in the elderly individuals reported in the recent literature.

Keywords: distal radius fracture; elderly; geriatric trauma; osteoporosis; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Anatomy of the distal radius. A, Palmar tilt. B, Radial inclination. C, Radial length. D, Ulnar variance.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Osteoporotic distal radius fracture with concomitant distal ulna fracture stabilized with K-wires.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Osteoporotic distal radius fracture with concomitant distal ulna fracture stabilized with K-wires and additional external fixator. Neither the radial inclination nor the radial length could be restored in this unstable fracture.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Osteoporotic distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate.

References

    1. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1868–1873 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):1944–1951 - PubMed
    1. McQueen M, Caspers J. Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(4):649–651 - PubMed
    1. Beumer A, McQueen MM. Fractures of the distal radius in low-demand elderly patients: closed reduction of no value in 53 of 60 wrists. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(1):98–100 - PubMed
    1. McQueen MM, Hajducka C, Court-Brown CM. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(3):404–409 - PubMed