PURLs: optimal timing for peripheral IV replacement?
- PMID: 23570032
- PMCID: PMC3630081
PURLs: optimal timing for peripheral IV replacement?
Abstract
There’s no downside to switching from routine to clinically indicated replacement of peripheral IV catheters. And your patients will appreciate having fewer needlesticks.
Comment on
-
Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1066-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22998716 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1066–1074. - PubMed
-
- Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1159–1171. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/BSI/references-BSI-guidelines-2011.html . Accessed March 13, 2013.
