Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(4):e60083.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060083. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

Characterization of SNPs associated with prostate cancer in men of Ashkenazic descent from the set of GWAS identified SNPs: impact of cancer family history and cumulative SNP risk prediction

Affiliations

Characterization of SNPs associated with prostate cancer in men of Ashkenazic descent from the set of GWAS identified SNPs: impact of cancer family history and cumulative SNP risk prediction

Ilir Agalliu et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple SNPs associated with prostate cancer (PrCa). Population isolates may have different sets of risk alleles for PrCa constituting unique population and individual risk profiles.

Methods: To test this hypothesis, associations between 31 GWAS SNPs of PrCa were examined among 979 PrCa cases and 1,251 controls of Ashkenazic descent using logistic regression. We also investigated risks by age at diagnosis, pathological features of PrCa, and family history of cancer. Moreover, we examined associations between cumulative number of risk alleles and PrCa and assessed the utility of risk alleles in PrCa risk prediction by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) for different logistic models.

Results: Of the 31 genotyped SNPs, 8 were associated with PrCa at p ≤ 0.002 (corrected p-value threshold) with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 1.22 to 1.42 per risk allele. Four SNPs were associated with aggressive PrCa, while three other SNPs showed potential interactions for PrCa by family history of PrCa (rs8102476; 19q13), lung cancer (rs17021918; 4q22), and breast cancer (rs10896449; 11q13). Men in the highest vs. lowest quartile of cumulative number of risk alleles had ORs of 3.70 (95% CI 2.76-4.97); 3.76 (95% CI 2.57-5.50), and 5.20 (95% CI 2.94-9.19) for overall PrCa, aggressive cancer and younger age at diagnosis, respectively. The addition of cumulative risk alleles to the model containing age at diagnosis and family history of PrCa yielded a slightly higher AUC (0.69 vs. 0.64).

Conclusion: These data define a set of risk alleles associated with PrCa in men of Ashkenazic descent and indicate possible genetic differences for PrCa between populations of European and Ashkenazic ancestry. Use of genetic markers might provide an opportunity to identify men at highest risk for younger age of onset PrCa; however, their clinical utility in identifying men at highest risk for aggressive cancer remains limited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: One of the co-authors (Dr. Zhaoming Wang) of this manuscript is employed by the Core Genotyping Facility, SAIC-Frederick, Inc. In addition, the authors note that Dr. Robert D. Burk is an Academic Editor of PLOS ONE. However, the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest and that this does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of the cumulative number of risk alleles among prostate cancer cases and control subjects.
Solid lines represent the median number of risk alleles in controls (black line) and cases (red line). The arrow shows the shift in median number of risk alleles between cases and controls. Abbreviation, SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for risk prediction of prostate cancer for three different models incorporating cumulative number of risk alleles, age at diagnosis and family history (FH) of prostate cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta Georgia.
    1. Jemal A, Bray F (2011) Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, et al. (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer–analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343: 78–85. - PubMed
    1. Amundadottir LT, Thorvaldsson S, Gudbjartsson DF, Sulem P, Kristjansson K, et al. (2004) Cancer as a complex phenotype: pattern of cancer distribution within and beyond the nuclear family. PLoS Medicine 1(3): e65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruner DW, Moore D, Parlanti A, Dorgan J, Engstrom P (2003) Relative risk of prostate cancer for men with affected relatives: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 107: 797–803. - PubMed

Publication types