Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?
- PMID: 23573277
- PMCID: PMC3616109
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713
Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?
Abstract
Telling a lie takes longer than telling the truth but precisely why remains uncertain. We investigated two processes suggested to increase response times, namely the decision to lie and the construction of a lie response. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were directed or chose whether to lie or tell the truth. A colored square was presented and participants had to name either the true color of the square or lie about it by claiming it was a different color. In both experiments we found that there was a greater difference between lying and telling the truth when participants were directed to lie compared to when they chose to lie. In Experiments 3 and 4, we compared response times when participants had only one possible lie option to a choice of two or three possible options. There was a greater lying latency effect when questions involved more than one possible lie response. Experiment 5 examined response choice mechanisms through the manipulation of lie plausibility. Overall, results demonstrate several distinct mechanisms that contribute to additional processing requirements when individuals tell a lie.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures








Similar articles
-
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):478-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4. Epub 2014 Jun 13. Psychol Res. 2015. PMID: 24923778
-
Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Oct;97(2):451-60. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.451. Percept Mot Skills. 2003. PMID: 14620232
-
An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Sep;169:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 22. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016. PMID: 27219533
-
From little white lies to filthy liars: the evolution of honesty and deception in young children.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;40:139-79. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00004-9. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011. PMID: 21887961 Review.
-
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28182460 Review.
Cited by
-
The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression.Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;9:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249. eCollection 2018. Front Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29937740 Free PMC article.
-
False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences.Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00283. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29559945 Free PMC article.
-
A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 31;6:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01298. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26379610 Free PMC article.
-
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):478-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4. Epub 2014 Jun 13. Psychol Res. 2015. PMID: 24923778
-
Detecting faking-good response style in personality questionnaires with four choice alternatives.Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3094-3107. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01473-3. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Psychol Res. 2021. PMID: 33452928 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Walczyk JJ, Roper KS, Seemann E, Humphrey AM (2003) Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17: 755–774.
-
- Serota KB, Levine TR, Boster FJ (2010) The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self-reported lies. Human Communication Research 36: 2–25.
-
- Cole T (2001) Lying to the one you love: The use of deception in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 18: 107–129.
-
- DePaulo BM, Kashy DA (1998) Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 63–79. - PubMed
-
- Seiter JS, Bruschke J, Bai C (2002) The acceptability of deception as a function of perceivers' culture, deceiver's intention, and deceiver-deceived relationship. Western Journal of Communication 66: 158–180.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources