Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction
- PMID: 23573806
- DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00227
Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction
Abstract
Micro-implant is a device that is temporarily fixed to bone for the purpose of enhancing orthodontic anchorage either by supporting the teeth of the reactive unit or by obviating the need for the reactive unit altogether, and which is subsequently removed after use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency of micro-implants in reinforcing anchorage during the initial retraction of anterior teeth, check the rate of initial retraction for 8 weeks, and assess the stability of micro-implants during this period. Eighteen micro-implants were placed (10 in the maxilla and 8 in the mandible) and immediately loaded with 200-250 g of force using 9-mm closed coil Nitinol springs. The amount of space closure was measured every 2 weeks until the eighth week. Cephalometric measurements were made at the end of the study to evaluate anchor loss, if any. Micro-implant stability was also assessed. The rate of initial retraction in the maxilla at the end of 8 weeks was 1.65 mm/quadrant and 1.51 mm/quadrant in the mandible. The amount of retraction on the left side of the arches was 1.66 mm/quadrant and 1.49 mm/quadrant on the right side. The average initial retraction for both arches per month was 0.78 mm. An anchor loss of 0.1 mm (0.06%) was observed in the maxilla while no mandibular anchor loss was recorded. The rate of initial retraction observed in the maxilla was more than that achieved in the mandible. Initial retraction was also more on the left side of the arches. There was no anchor loss in the mandible. The micro-implant-reinforced anchorage was helpful in minimizing anchor loss and accepted heavy traction forces but did not bring about a faster rate of retraction.
Keywords: anchorage; bimaxillary protrusion; immediate loading; initial retraction; micro-implants; temporary anchorage devices.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.044. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18617100
-
Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):204-12. Aust Orthod J. 2012. PMID: 23304969
-
Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):128-36. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cc4aa5. Implant Dent. 2010. PMID: 20386216 Clinical Trial.
-
Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S15-23. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000114. J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25138361 Review.
-
En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019. PMID: 31058623
Cited by
-
Evidence-based selection of orthodontic miniscrews, increasing their success rate in the mandibular buccal shelf. A randomized, prospective clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02460-3. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36127718 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Micro-implant anchorage in adolescent orthodontics: a promising and advantageous option.Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):1882-1891. doi: 10.62347/MORQ8289. eCollection 2025. Am J Transl Res. 2025. PMID: 40225991 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources