Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 10:9:71.
doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-71.

Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity

Affiliations

Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity

Marnie L Brennan et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The limited use of biosecurity practices by many in the farming community is likely to be due to a range of factors; further understanding of this issue is required. In this study, attitudes and behaviours of producers relating to selected biosecurity practices and the farming industry were studied by interviewing cattle farmers within a 100 km2 study area in north-west England using an interview-based questionnaire.

Results: Most producers appeared to be familiar with the broad concept of the term biosecurity, although risks due to indirect contacts, rather than direct (animal) contacts, were more frequently highlighted. Most producers felt the nominated biosecurity practices were in some way useful, however there was not always agreement between the usefulness of a practice and it being undertaken, and vice versa. In agreement with other studies conducted in the UK, farmers most preferred to obtain information and advice on biosecurity from private veterinarians, but also highlighted DEFRA as a source.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of understanding the motivators and barriers behind the uptake of biosecurity practices on farms, as perceptions are variable. Further understanding of these issues is needed in order to more effectively communicate information in regards to herd health and disease prevention. By identifying differences in producers' attitudes, programs can be tailored specifically to individuals' needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attitudes towards 19 biosecurity practices as nominated by 56 farmers within the study area. C & D represents ‘clean and disinfect’.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred sources of information on biosecurity as nominated by 56 farmers within the study area, and whose advice farmers would be most likely to take on such issues.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MAFF/DEFRA. Farm biosecurity: Protecting herd health. 2002. http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/resources/000/107/894/biosec.pdf.
    1. van Schaik G, Dijkhuizen AA, Benedictus G, Barkema HW, Koole JL. Exploratory study on the economic value of a closed farming system on Dutch dairy farms. Vet Rec. 1998;142(10):240–242. doi: 10.1136/vr.142.10.240. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson JF. Biosecurity - a new term for an old concept - how to apply it. Bovine Pr. 1998;32(2):61–70.
    1. Hennessy DA. Economic aspects of agricultural and food biosecurity. Biosecur Bioterror. 2008;6(1):66–77. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2007.0016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dargatz DA, Garry FB, Traub-Dargatz JL. An introduction to biosecurity of cattle operations. Vet Clin N Am-Food Anim Pract. 2002;18(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00002-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources