Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 10:8:42.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-42.

Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery

Xavier Bonfill  1 , Marta Roqué, Marta Beatriz Aller, Dimelza Osorio, Carles Foradada, Angels Vives, David Rigau
Affiliations

Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery

Xavier Bonfill et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this research is to generate quality of care indicators from systematic reviews to assess the appropriateness of obstetric care in hospitals.

Methods: A search for systematic reviews about hospital obstetric interventions, conducted in The Cochrane Library, clinical evidence and practice guidelines, identified 303 reviews. We selected 48 high-quality evidence reviews, which resulted in strong clinical recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The 255 remaining reviews were excluded, mainly due to a lack of strong evidence provided by the studies reviewed.

Results: A total of 18 indicators were formulated from these clinical recommendations, on antepartum care (8), care during delivery and postpartum (9), and incomplete miscarriage (1). Authors of the systematic reviews and specialists in obstetrics were consulted to refine the formulation of indicators.

Conclusions: High-quality systematic reviews, whose conclusions clearly claim in favour or against an intervention, can be a source for generating quality indicators of delivery care. To make indicators coherent, the nuances of clinical practice should be considered. Any attempt made to evaluate the extent to which delivery care in hospitals is based on scientific evidence should take the generated indicators into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Short title: Study’s flowchart. Detailed legend: Flowchart of studies identified in the bibliographic search.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance, Volume I. Washington D.C; 1990.
    1. Eddy DM. Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984;3:74–89. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.74. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buen JM, Peiró S, Caldern SM. Variations in medical practice: importance, causes, and implications. Med Clin (Barc) 1998;110:382–390. - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:407–410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92781-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types