Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences
- PMID: 23575462
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828e4dad
Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences
Abstract
Objectives: It would be clinically valuable if an electrophysiological validation of hearing aid effectiveness in conveying speech information could be performed when a device is first provided to the individual after electroacoustic verification. This study evaluated envelope following responses (EFRs) elicited by English vowels in a steady state context and in natural sentences. It was the purpose of this study to determine whether EFRs could be detected rapidly enough to be clinically useful.
Design: EFRs were elicited using 5 vowels spanning the English vowel space, /i/, /ε/, /æ/, /(Equation is included in full-text article.)/, and /u/. These were presented either as concatenated steady state vowels (total duration 10.04 seconds) or in three 5-word sentences (total duration 11.77 seconds), where each vowel appeared once per sentence. Single-channel electroencephalogram was recorded from vertex (Cz) to the nape of the neck for 190 and 160 repetitions of the steady state vowels and sentences, respectively. The stimuli were presented at 70 dBA SPL. The fundamental frequency (f0) track from the stimuli was used with a Fourier analyzer to estimate the EFRs to each vowel. Noise amplitudes were also calculated at neighboring frequencies. Fifteen normal-hearing subjects who were 20 to 34 years of age participated in the experiment.
Results: In the analysis of steady state vowels, the mean response amplitude of /i/ was statistically the largest at 173 nV. The other 4 steady state vowels did not differ in mean response amplitude, which varied between 73 and 106 nV. In the analysis of vowels from the 3 sentences, the largest response amplitudes tended to be for /u/. Mean amplitudes for /u/ were 164, 111, and 140 nV for the words "booed," "food," and "Sue," respectively. The vowel /u/ produced statistically larger responses than /i/, /ε/, and /(Equation is included in full-text article.)/ when grouped across words, whereas other vowels did not differ. Mean response amplitudes for the other vowel categories in the sentences varied between 82 and 105 nV. All subjects showed significant EFRs in response to the words "Bee's" and "booed," but only 9 subjects showed significant EFRs for "pet," "bed," and "Bob."
Conclusions: The authors were readily able to detect significant EFRs elicited by vowels in a steady state context and from 3 natural sentences. These results are promising as an early step in developing a clinical tool for validating that vowel stimuli are at least partially encoded at the level of the auditory brainstem. Future research will require evaluation of the technique with aided listeners, where the natural sentences are expected to be treated as typical speech by hearing aid signal-processing algorithms.
Similar articles
-
The Influence of Male- and Female-Spoken Vowel Acoustics on Envelope-Following Responses.Semin Hear. 2022 Oct 26;43(3):223-239. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756165. eCollection 2022 Aug. Semin Hear. 2022. PMID: 36313043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):619-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000188. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 26226607
-
The Influence of Vowel Identity, Vowel Production Variability, and Consonant Environment on Envelope Following Responses.Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):662-672. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000966. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 33577218
-
Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.Hear Res. 2015 Feb;320:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25500177
-
The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials.Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1991;491:153-9; discussion 160. doi: 10.3109/00016489109136793. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1991. PMID: 1814147 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing Speech Audibility via Syllabic-Rate Neural Responses in Adults and Children With and Without Hearing Loss.Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241227815. doi: 10.1177/23312165241227815. Trends Hear. 2024. PMID: 38545698 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses.Ear Hear. 2022 Jan/Feb;43(1):250-254. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001078. Ear Hear. 2022. PMID: 34260437 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Male- and Female-Spoken Vowel Acoustics on Envelope-Following Responses.Semin Hear. 2022 Oct 26;43(3):223-239. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756165. eCollection 2022 Aug. Semin Hear. 2022. PMID: 36313043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of phoneme contexts on adaptation in vowel-evoked envelope following responses.Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Sep;56(5):4572-4582. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15768. Epub 2022 Aug 14. Eur J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35804282 Free PMC article.
-
Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec;23(6):759-769. doi: 10.1007/s10162-022-00855-1. Epub 2022 Aug 24. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36002663 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical