The microbial desulfurization of coal
- PMID: 23576051
- DOI: 10.1007/10_2013_178
The microbial desulfurization of coal
Abstract
The chemical structure of coal macerals is usually characterized by the presence of inorganic and organic sulfur. Inorganic sulfur consists mostly of iron sulfides, the so-called "pyritic sulfur," whereas organic sulfur is covalently bound to the carbon atoms of the coal macromolecule. Comminution of coal to sizes that liberate the iron sulfide grains makes their removal with mineral beneficiation processes theoretically possible, but practically profitless. Microbial removal of pyritic sulfur has been extensively investigated over the last 50 years and the very promising results obtained have encouraged the design and construction of a semi-commercial pilot plant in the framework of Project JOULE 0039 funded by the European Commission. The results of the 1-year operation of this plant are reported here, the most significant being the 90 % pyrite removal achieved in five stirred tank bioreactors operating with a 40 % solids suspension and the pyritic iron solubilization rate of 36 mg dm(-3) h(-1). Taking into account the very high price of the kWh in Italy, a rough estimate of the overall costs is in the range from 25 to 30 <euro> per tonne of dry coal. So far the development of a microbial process for organic sulfur removal has shown to be much more difficult and less successful, although significant progress in laboratory research is reported.
Similar articles
-
Comparison analysis of coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Oct 27;2013:184964. doi: 10.1155/2013/184964. eCollection 2013. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. PMID: 24288464 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of microbial nutrients supply on coal bio-desulfurization.J Hazard Mater. 2020 Feb 15;384:121324. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121324. Epub 2019 Sep 26. J Hazard Mater. 2020. PMID: 31586921
-
Bioleaching of pyritic coal wastes: bioprospecting and efficiency of selected consortia.Res Microbiol. 2020 Oct-Nov;171(7):260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Res Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32890633
-
Current approaches for mitigating acid mine drainage.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;226:1-32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6898-1_1. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23625128 Review.
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
Cited by
-
Intermediates in the Sox sulfur oxidation pathway are bound to a sulfane conjugate of the carrier protein SoxYZ.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0173395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173395. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28257465 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison analysis of coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Oct 27;2013:184964. doi: 10.1155/2013/184964. eCollection 2013. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. PMID: 24288464 Free PMC article.
-
Biodesulfurization of Fossil Fuels: Analysis and Prospective.F1000Res. 2023 Sep 8;12:1116. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133427.1. eCollection 2023. F1000Res. 2023. PMID: 38533421 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical