Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 23576473
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.12479
Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of antenatal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in the prediction of risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in women with a previous Cesarean section (CS).
Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify articles published on the subject of sonographic LUS measurement and occurrence of a uterine defect after delivery. Four independent researchers performed identification of papers and data extraction. Selected studies were scored on methodological quality, and sensitivity and specificity of measurement of LUS thickness in the prediction of a uterine defect were calculated. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to estimate summary receiver-operating characteristics (sROC) curves.
Results: We included 21 studies with a total of 2776 analyzed patients. The quality of included studies was good, although comparison was difficult because of heterogeneity. The estimated sROC curves showed that measurement of LUS thickness seems promising in the prediction of occurrence of uterine defects (dehiscence and rupture) in the uterine wall. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of myometrial LUS thickness for cut-offs between 0.6 and 2.0 mm was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60-0.87) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97); cut-offs between 2.1 and 4.0 mm reached a sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.26-0.90). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full LUS thickness for cut-offs between 2.0 and 3.0 mm was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.42-0.77) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96); cut-offs between 3.1 and 5.1 mm reached a sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.30-0.87).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides support for the use of antenatal LUS measurements in the prediction of a uterine defect during TOL. Clinical applicability should be assessed in prospective observational studies using a standardized method of measurement.
Keywords: Caesarean section; lower uterine segment; sonography; trial of labor; uterine rupture.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
[Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Apr;46(4):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 29625873 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):609-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25814295
-
Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Jul;27(7):674-81. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30545-x. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005. PMID: 16100622
-
Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):830-841. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13585. Epub 2019 Mar 29. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 30779345
-
Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Apr;32(4):321-327. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010. PMID: 20500938
Cited by
-
Outcome of Induction of Labor with Foley's Catheter in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section with Unfavorable Cervix: An Experience From a Tertiary Care Institute in South India.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Feb;72(1):26-31. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01459-0. Epub 2021 Mar 24. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022. PMID: 35125735 Free PMC article.
-
New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023 Jan;50(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01265-9. Epub 2022 Dec 19. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023. PMID: 36536061 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of the myometrial scar defect at repeat caesarean section: a modified surgical technique.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04040-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34404382 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in lower uterine segment thickness during different gestational weeks in pregnant women qualified for trial of labor after cesarean section.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;157(3):710-718. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13902. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 34449908 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 29;14:365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25733122 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources