Plant diversity effects on soil food webs are stronger than those of elevated CO2 and N deposition in a long-term grassland experiment
- PMID: 23576722
- PMCID: PMC3637779
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217382110
Plant diversity effects on soil food webs are stronger than those of elevated CO2 and N deposition in a long-term grassland experiment
Abstract
Recent metaanalyses suggest biodiversity loss affects the functioning of ecosystems to a similar extent as other global environmental change agents. However, the abundance and functioning of soil organisms have been hypothesized to be much less responsive to such changes, particularly in plant diversity, than aboveground variables, although tests of this hypothesis are extremely rare. We examined the responses of soil food webs (soil microorganisms, nematodes, microarthropods) to 13-y manipulation of multiple environmental factors that are changing at global scales--specifically plant species richness, atmospheric CO2, and N deposition--in a grassland experiment in Minnesota. Plant diversity was a strong driver of the structure and functioning of soil food webs through several bottom-up (resource control) effects, whereas CO2 and N only had modest effects. We found few interactions between plant diversity and CO2 and N, likely because of weak interactive effects of those factors on resource availability (e.g., root biomass). Plant diversity effects likely were large because high plant diversity promoted the accumulation of soil organic matter in the site's sandy, organic matter-poor soils. Plant diversity effects were not explained by the presence of certain plant functional groups. Our results underline the prime importance of plant diversity loss cascading to soil food webs (density and diversity of soil organisms) and functions. Because the present results suggest prevailing plant diversity effects and few interactions with other global change drivers, protecting plant diversity may be of high priority to maintain the biodiversity and functioning of soils in a changing world.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
= 2.43, P = 0.93). Numbers on arrows are standardized path coefficients. Solid line arrows indicate significant paths (P < 0.05); dotted lines indicate nonsignificant arrows (black = positive, red = negative). Percentages indicate the variance explained by the model. (B) Causal influences of plant diversity on the soil nematode community (
= 11.54, P = 0.24).References
-
- Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science. 1997;277(5325):494–499.
-
- Millenium Ecosystem Assessment . Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.
-
- IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland)
-
- Butchart SHM, et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science. 2010;328(5982):1164–1168. - PubMed
-
- Cardinale BJ, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 2012;486(7401):59–67. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
