Is ICSI Risky?
- PMID: 23577031
- PMCID: PMC3600334
- DOI: 10.1155/2013/473289
Is ICSI Risky?
Abstract
As assisted reproductive technology (ART) methods become the mainstream of infertility treatment, it has become even more critical to reassess its safety. Following the results of a study published by the Robinson Institute in the New England Journal of Medicine, the risk of ART, especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has never been so closely scrutinized. This paper traces the origins and development of ICSI, assesses the risks documented in the literature, and finally interprets the implications of the study for couples contemplating therapy. We support the need for continued vigilance towards ICSI and the importance in investigating male-factor infertility as a prequel to its use.
References
-
- Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. The Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17–18. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2009 Success Rates Assisted Reproductive Technologies. American Society for Reproductive Medicine & Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology [Internet] 2011.
-
- Oehninger S. Place of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in management of male infertility. The Lancet. 2001;357(9274):2068–2069. - PubMed
-
- Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Human Reproduction. 1995;10(5):1123–1129. - PubMed
-
- Oehninger S, Veeck L, Lanzendorf S, Maloney M, Toner J, Muasher S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent primarily upon female and not male factors. Fertility and Sterility. 1995;64(5):977–981. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
