Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(4):e57680.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057680. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Genome-scale screening of drug-target associations relevant to Ki using a chemogenomics approach

Affiliations

Genome-scale screening of drug-target associations relevant to Ki using a chemogenomics approach

Dong-Sheng Cao et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

The identification of interactions between drugs and target proteins plays a key role in genomic drug discovery. In the present study, the quantitative binding affinities of drug-target pairs are differentiated as a measurement to define whether a drug interacts with a protein or not, and then a chemogenomics framework using an unbiased set of general integrated features and random forest (RF) is employed to construct a predictive model which can accurately classify drug-target pairs. The predictability of the model is further investigated and validated by several independent validation sets. The built model is used to predict drug-target associations, some of which were confirmed by comparing experimental data from public biological resources. A drug-target interaction network with high confidence drug-target pairs was also reconstructed. This network provides further insight for the action of drugs and targets. Finally, a web-based server called PreDPI-Ki was developed to predict drug-target interactions for drug discovery. In addition to providing a high-confidence list of drug-target associations for subsequent experimental investigation guidance, these results also contribute to the understanding of drug-target interactions. We can also see that quantitative information of drug-target associations could greatly promote the development of more accurate models. The PreDPI-Ki server is freely available via: http://sdd.whu.edu.cn/dpiki.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Outline of our methodology.
(A) Interaction features are calculated by combing the fingerprint descriptors from drugs and the CTD and amino acid composition descriptors from protein sequences. These feature vectors are used to find the optimal RF parameters which most accurately separate the positive and negative training sets. The independent validation sets are used for further validation for the RF model. (B) Once the RF model is constructed, we can predict new unknown drug-target associations or screen all cross-linking associations.
Figure 2
Figure 2. ROCs and precision-recall curves for Naïve Bayes (green) and random forest (red) with full and selected features.
(A) ROCs (B) precision-recall curves.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The plot of Ki versus prediction probability on 5-fold cross validation.
non-interaction: red and interaction: green. Linear relationship between Ki and prediction probability could be observed with correlation coefficient of 0.65.
Figure 4
Figure 4. ROCs and precision-recall curves with different Ki thresholds using RF.
(A) ROCs (B) precision-recall curves. The auPRCs drop with the decreasing of Ki thresholds. However, the varying trend of auROCs is consistent with that of auPRCs.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The predictive probability plot of screening all cross-linking drug-target pairs. The size of predictive probability gradually varies from green to red.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Drug-target interaction network using drug-target pairs with prediction probability above 0.99.
Drugs and targets are presented by red circle and blue triangle, respectively. Drug-target interactions are represented by the edges connecting related drugs and targets.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kuhn M, Campillos M, Gonzolez P, Jensen LJ, Bork P (2008) Large-scale prediction of drug-target relationships. FEBS letters 582: 1283–1290. - PubMed
    1. Yildirim MA, Goh KI, Cusick ME, Barabsi AL, Vidal M (2007) Drug-target network. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1119–1126. - PubMed
    1. Paolini GV, Shapland RHB, van Hoorn WP, Mason JS, Hopkins AL (2006) Global mapping of pharmacological space. Nat Biotech 24: 805–815. - PubMed
    1. Yao L, Evans JA, Rzhetsky A (2009) Novel opportunities for computational biology and sociology in drug discovery: Corrected paper. Trends in Biotechnology 28: 161–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashburn TT, Thor KB (2004) Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 673–683. - PubMed

Publication types