Chromosome abnormalities and viability of vitrified eight-cell mouse embryos at presence of two different cryoprotectants at different storage durations
- PMID: 23577304
- PMCID: PMC3593929
Chromosome abnormalities and viability of vitrified eight-cell mouse embryos at presence of two different cryoprotectants at different storage durations
Abstract
Objective: Experiments were conducted to find the differences between post-thaw viability and chromosome aberrations in eight-cell mouse embryos at presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 1, 2-propanediol (PROH) as croprotectants in different storage durations.
Materials and methods: In this case-control study, a total number of 720 mouse embryos from about 250 NMRI mice were vitrified with 30% PROH or DMSO; each diluted with a solution containing 30% ficol plus 0.5 M sucrose. Embryos were exposed to the solutions for 0.5 minute at 25℃ followed by cooling in liquid nitrogen, then after appropriate storage duration, they were rapidly warmed. Besides, there were 100 mouse embryos for each cryoprotectant group (totally 200 embryos) as control. Embryo survival was assessed by in vitro development, and chromosome abnormalities were analyzed by Giemsa staining.
Results: The proportion of mitotic abnormalities in PROH/DMSO vitrified embryos was significantly higher than unfrozen control group. This was confirmed also by a reduced viability of the embryos as judged by a culture at the blastocyst stage (p<0.05 in all test groups).
Conclusion: It can be deduced that long term cryopreservation may result in chromosomal abnormalities and/or low viability.
Keywords: Chromosome Abnormality; Cryopreservation; Mouse Embryo; Viability.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Effect of cryoprotectants and their concentration on post-thaw survival and development of rapid frozen-thawed pronuclear stage mouse embryos.Hum Reprod. 1995 Dec;10(12):3237-42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135895. Hum Reprod. 1995. PMID: 8822451
-
Effect of vitrification on viability and chromosome abnormalities in 8-cell mouse embryos at various storage durations.Biol Res. 2007;40(3):299-306. Epub 2008 Apr 17. Biol Res. 2007. PMID: 18449458
-
Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos.Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2874-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2874. Hum Reprod. 1998. PMID: 9804248
-
Effect of cryoprotectants and their concentration on in vitro development of vitrified-warmed immature oocytes in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Theriogenology. 2004 Apr 1;61(5):831-42. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.06.002. Theriogenology. 2004. PMID: 14757469
-
Comparative study between slow freezing and vitrification of mouse embryos using different cryoprotectants.Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Oct;44(5):788-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01078.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009. PMID: 18992080
Cited by
-
Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 14;14:1148411. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148411. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36998477 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Trounson A. Preservation of human eggs and embryos. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(1):1–12. - PubMed
-
- Bergh C, Werner C, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Cumulative birth rates following cryopreservation of all embryos in stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(3):191–194. - PubMed
-
- Ombelet W, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Martens G. Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction-the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):3–14. - PubMed
-
- Van Landuyt L, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. New Belgian embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(6):765–771. - PubMed
-
- Neubourg DD, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Ryckaert G, Valkenburg M, et al. Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2621–2625. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources