Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction
- PMID: 23578749
- PMCID: PMC3902200
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.009
Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction" [Cortex 49 (9) (2013) 2294-2306].Cortex. 2016 Jun 2;81:278-. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.004. Online ahead of print. Cortex. 2016. PMID: 27292572 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Despite substantial neuroscientific evidence for a region of visual cortex dedicated to the processing of written words, many studies continue to reject explanations of letter-by-letter (LBL) reading in terms of impaired word form representations or parallel letter processing in favour of more general deficits of visual function. In the current paper, we demonstrate that whilst LBL reading is often associated with general visual deficits, these deficits are not necessarily sufficient to cause reading impairment and have led to accounts of LBL reading which are based largely on evidence of association rather than causation. We describe two patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) who exhibit remarkably preserved whole word and letter reading despite profound visual dysfunction. Relative to controls, both patients demonstrated impaired performance on tests of early visual, visuoperceptual and visuospatial processing; visual acuity was the only skill preserved in both individuals. By contrast, both patients were able to read aloud words with perfect to near-perfect accuracy. Reading performance was also rapid with no overall significant difference in response latencies relative to age- and education-matched controls. Furthermore, the patients violated a key prediction of general visual accounts of LBL reading - that pre-lexical impairments should result in prominent word length effects; in the two reported patients, evidence for abnormal word length effects was equivocal or absent, and certainly an order of magnitude different to that reported for LBL readers. We argue that general visual accounts cannot explain the pattern of reading data reported, and attribute the preserved reading performance to preserved direct access to intact word form representations and/or parallel letter processing mechanisms. The current data emphasise the need for much clearer evidence of causality when attempting to draw connections between specific aspects of visual processing and different types of acquired peripheral dyslexia.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease (AD); Letter-by-letter reading; Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA); Pure alexia; Word form dyslexia.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
(Con)text-specific effects of visual dysfunction on reading in posterior cortical atrophy.Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 12. Cortex. 2014. PMID: 24841985 Free PMC article.
-
What lies beneath: a comparison of reading aloud in pure alexia and semantic dementia.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):461-81. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.882300. Epub 2014 Apr 7. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 24702272 Free PMC article.
-
Brain activations during letter-by-letter reading: a follow-up study.Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(14):1983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.007. Neuropsychologia. 2005. PMID: 15904939
-
The word-length effect in reading: a review.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):378-412. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.895314. Epub 2014 Mar 26. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 24665973 Review.
-
The myth of the visual word form area.Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):473-81. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00084-3. Neuroimage. 2003. PMID: 12880781 Review.
Cited by
-
Are children with developmental dyslexia all the same? A cluster analysis with more than 300 cases.Dyslexia. 2019 Aug;25(3):284-295. doi: 10.1002/dys.1629. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Dyslexia. 2019. PMID: 31332875 Free PMC article.
-
Processing deficits for familiar and novel faces in patients with left posterior fusiform lesions.Cortex. 2015 Nov;72:79-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Cortex. 2015. PMID: 25837867 Free PMC article.
-
What's in a name? The characterization of pure alexia.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):367-77. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.924226. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 25051117 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
(Con)text-specific effects of visual dysfunction on reading in posterior cortical atrophy.Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 12. Cortex. 2014. PMID: 24841985 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior cortical atrophy: review of the recent literature.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Dec;13(12):406. doi: 10.1007/s11910-013-0406-8. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013. PMID: 24136454 Review.
References
-
- Arguin M and Bub D. Letter identification is over tokens, not types, in pure alexia. In Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Toronto, 1992.
-
- Arguin M., Bub D.N. Single-character processing in a case of pure alexia. Neuropsychologia. 1993;31(5):435–458. - PubMed
-
- Baxter D.M., Warrington E.K. Measuring dysgraphia: A graded-difficulty spelling test. Behavioural Neurology. 1994;7:107–116. - PubMed
-
- Behrmann M., Nelson J., Sekuler E.B. Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36(11):1115–1132. - PubMed
-
- Behrmann M., Plaut D.C., Nelson J. A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1998;15(1–2):7–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources