Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes
- PMID: 23579214
- PMCID: PMC3668471
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.139
Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes
Abstract
Background: Around 1 in 10 of all cancer cases occur in adults of reproductive age. Cancer and its treatments can cause long-term effects, such as loss of fertility, which can lead to poor emotional adjustment. Unmet information needs are associated with higher levels of anxiety. US research suggests that many oncologists do not discuss fertility. Very little research exists about fertility information provision in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to explore current knowledge, practice and attitudes among oncologists in the United Kingdom regarding fertility preservation in patients of child-bearing age.
Methods: A national online survey of 100 oncologists conducted online via medeconnect, a company which has exclusive access to the doctors.net.uk membership of GMC registered doctors.
Results: Oncologists saw fertility preservation (FP) as mainly a women's issue, and yet only felt knowledgeable about sperm storage, not other methods of FP; 87% expressed a need for more information. Most reported discussing the impact of treatment on fertility with patients, but only 38% reported routinely providing patients with written information, and 1/3 reported they did not usually refer patients who had questions about fertility to a specialist fertility service. Twenty-three per cent had never consulted any FP guidelines. The main barriers to initiating discussions about FP were lack of time, lack of knowledge, perceived poor success rates of FP options, poor patient prognosis and, to a lesser extent, if the patient already had children, was single, or could not afford FP treatment.
Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest a deficiency in UK oncologist's knowledge about FP options and highlights that the provision of information to patients about FP may be sub-optimal. Oncologists may benefit from further education, and further research is required to establish if patients perceive a need for further information about FP options.
Comment in
-
Comment on 'Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes'--oncologists must not allow personal attitudes to influence discussions on fertility preservation for cancer survivors.Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;109(7):2020. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.459. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23942065 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply: Comment on 'Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes'--oncologists must not allow personal attitudes to influence discussions on fertility preservation for cancer survivors.Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;109(7):2021-2. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.460. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23942077 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Little information about fertility preservation is provided for cancer patients: A survey of oncologists' knowledge, attitude and current practice.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12947. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12947. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019. PMID: 30421553
-
Perceptions and attitudes of medical oncologists regarding fertility preservation and pregnancy in high-risk cancer patients: A survey among Canadian medical oncologists.Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1912-1921. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5023. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 35833372 Free PMC article.
-
Comment on 'Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes'--oncologists must not allow personal attitudes to influence discussions on fertility preservation for cancer survivors.Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;109(7):2020. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.459. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23942065 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Oncologists' and pediatric oncologists' perspectives and challenges for fertility preservation.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 May;98(5):598-603. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13551. Epub 2019 Feb 24. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 30714120 Review.
-
What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Jul 1;23(4):433-457. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx009. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28510760 Review.
Cited by
-
Survey of professionals on breast cancer, fertility preservation and pregnancy in Argentina.Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Feb 10;15:1183. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1183. eCollection 2021. Ecancermedicalscience. 2021. PMID: 33777176 Free PMC article.
-
Reproduction in life and death: should cancer patients with a poor prognosis be offered fertility preservation interventions?Reprod Fertil. 2023 Sep 1;4(4):e230047. doi: 10.1530/RAF-23-0047. Online ahead of print. Reprod Fertil. 2023. PMID: 37869895 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility preservation in Malaysian pediatric cohort: a survey of healthcare providers' knowledge, practice, attitude, perceptions and barriers.Front Pediatr. 2024 Sep 19;12:1419515. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1419515. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39363970 Free PMC article.
-
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitude and Current Behaviours towards Female Fertility Preservation Services within the UK.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;16(15):2649. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152649. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39123377 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With the Discussion of Fertility Preservation in a Cohort of 1,357 Young Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 28;11:701620. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701620. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34650912 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen C, Keane D, Harrison RF. A survey of Irish consultants regarding awareness of sperm freezing and assisted reproduction. Irish Med J. 2003;96 (1:23–25. - PubMed
-
- Anderson RA, Wallace WH. Uncertainties in preserving fertility in cancer treatment. BMJ. 2008;337:a2577. - PubMed
-
- Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Chang S, Banks PJ. Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13:147–160. - PubMed
-
- Braun M, Hasson-Ohayon I, Perry S, Kaufman B, Uziely B. Motivation for giving birth after breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14 (4:282–296. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources