Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 30;108(8):1602-15.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.139. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes

Affiliations

Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists' current knowledge, practice and attitudes

E Adams et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Around 1 in 10 of all cancer cases occur in adults of reproductive age. Cancer and its treatments can cause long-term effects, such as loss of fertility, which can lead to poor emotional adjustment. Unmet information needs are associated with higher levels of anxiety. US research suggests that many oncologists do not discuss fertility. Very little research exists about fertility information provision in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to explore current knowledge, practice and attitudes among oncologists in the United Kingdom regarding fertility preservation in patients of child-bearing age.

Methods: A national online survey of 100 oncologists conducted online via medeconnect, a company which has exclusive access to the doctors.net.uk membership of GMC registered doctors.

Results: Oncologists saw fertility preservation (FP) as mainly a women's issue, and yet only felt knowledgeable about sperm storage, not other methods of FP; 87% expressed a need for more information. Most reported discussing the impact of treatment on fertility with patients, but only 38% reported routinely providing patients with written information, and 1/3 reported they did not usually refer patients who had questions about fertility to a specialist fertility service. Twenty-three per cent had never consulted any FP guidelines. The main barriers to initiating discussions about FP were lack of time, lack of knowledge, perceived poor success rates of FP options, poor patient prognosis and, to a lesser extent, if the patient already had children, was single, or could not afford FP treatment.

Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest a deficiency in UK oncologist's knowledge about FP options and highlights that the provision of information to patients about FP may be sub-optimal. Oncologists may benefit from further education, and further research is required to establish if patients perceive a need for further information about FP options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajala T, Rafi J, Larsen-Disney P, Howell R.2010Fertility preservation for cancer patients: a review Obstetr Gynaecol Int 2010160386(Article ID 160386, 9 pages). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen C, Keane D, Harrison RF. A survey of Irish consultants regarding awareness of sperm freezing and assisted reproduction. Irish Med J. 2003;96 (1:23–25. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RA, Wallace WH. Uncertainties in preserving fertility in cancer treatment. BMJ. 2008;337:a2577. - PubMed
    1. Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Chang S, Banks PJ. Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13:147–160. - PubMed
    1. Braun M, Hasson-Ohayon I, Perry S, Kaufman B, Uziely B. Motivation for giving birth after breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2005;14 (4:282–296. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources