Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Oct;33(10):2493-501.
doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2742-z. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Is low-level laser therapy in relieving neck pain effective? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Is low-level laser therapy in relieving neck pain effective? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Amjed Kadhim-Saleh et al. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing acute and chronic neck pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). A systematic search of nine electronic databases was conducted to identify original articles. For study selection, two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full text for eligibility. Methodological quality was assessed using the Detsky scale. Data were analyzed using random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity and fixed-effect model in its absence. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic and quantifying I (2). Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 443 patients met the strict inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability for study selection was 92.8 % (95 % CIs 80.9-100 %) and for methodological quality assessment was 83.9 % (95 % CIs 19.4-96.8 %). Five trials included patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome (CMPS), and three trials included different patient populations. A meta-analysis of five CMPS trials revealed a mean improvement of VAS score of 10.54 with LLLT (95 % CI 0.37-20.71; Heterogeneity I (2 )= 65 %, P = 0.02). This systematic review provides inconclusive evidence because of significant between-study heterogeneity and potential risk of bias. The benefit seen in the use of LLLT, although statistically significant, does not constitute the threshold of minimally important clinical difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1897-908 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804 - PubMed
    1. Pain. 1993 Jan;52(1):63-66 - PubMed
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(3):229-35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources