Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan-Mar;11(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000100005.

Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Luiz Victor Maia Loureiro et al. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether Brazilian articles on cancer are published in journals with an impact factor and/or repercussion (measured by the number of citations) inferior to those that come from foreign organizations.

Methods: A search was carried out in PubMed for the MeSH term "neoplasm" with the limits clinical trial, affiliation of the Brazilian author(s), and interval from July 1st, 2009 to June 30, 2010. Selected for matching were non-Brazilian related articles published from three months prior to three months after the date of publication of the Brazilian study. The numbers of citations were obtained from two databases, as well as the impact factor for the journals in which the articles were published.

Results: Forty-three national and 876 related international articles were identified. The Brazilian publications had a mean impact factor of 3.000 versus 3.430 of the international ones (p=0.041). There was no statistically significant difference as to the number of citations between the two groups. The affiliation of the first author with a Brazilian or foreign organization did not significantly influence the number of citations or the impact factor.

Conclusion: Brazilian articles are significantly less accepted in journals with higher impact factors, although it does not compromise its repercussion on the scientific community.

Objetivo:: Investigar se artigos brasileiros sobre câncer são publicados em periódicos de fator impacto e/ou repercussão (medida pelo número de citações) inferiores aos oriundos de instituições estrangeiras

Métodos:: Pesquisou-se, no PubMed, o MeSH Term “neoplasm” com os limitadores: clinical trial, afiliação de autor(es) brasileira e intervalo de 1° de julho de 2009 a 30 de junho de 2010. Foram selecionados para pareamento artigos relacionados, não brasileiros, publicados entre três meses antes e três meses depois da data de publicação do estudo brasileiro. Foram obtidos os números de citações, em duas bases de dados, assim como o fator de impacto para as revistas nas quais os artigos foram publicados.

Resultados:: Identificaram-se 43 artigos nacionais e 876 internacionais relacionados. Os brasileiros apresentaram fator de impacto médio de 3.000 contra 3.430 dos internacionais (p=0,041). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa quanto ao número de citações entre os grupos. A afiliação do primeiro autor à instituição brasileira ou estrangeira também não influenciou significativamente no número de citações nem no fator de impacto.

Conclusão:: Artigos brasileiros são significativamente menos aceitos em revistas de maior impacto sem aparente comprometimento de sua repercussão na comunidade científica.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Impact factor of journals in which selected Brazilian and international articles were published (p=0.041), after matching per number of citations
Figure 2
Figure 2. A) Correlation between number of citations and IF of journals for national articles (Web of Science®: p=0.144; SciVerse®: p=0.198). (B) Correlation between number of citations and IF of journals for international articles (Web of Science®: p=0.001; SciVerse®: p=0.001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cruz CH. Brazil: Reward quality. Nature. 2012;490:334–334.
    1. Zorzetto R, Razzouk D, Dubugras MT, Gerolin J, Schor N, Guimarães JA, et al. The scientific production in health and biological sciences of the top 20 Brazilian universities. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(12):1513–1522. - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues PS, Fonseca L, Chaimovich H. Mapping cancer, cardiovascular and malaria research in Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33(8):853–867. - PubMed
    1. Saad ED, Pinheiro CM, Masson ALS, Borghesi G, Hoff PM, Prisco FE. Increasing output and low publication rate of Brazilian studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008;63(3):293–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tas F. The contribution of countries and world regions in productivity of oncological publication. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(11):1962–1968. - PubMed