Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?
- PMID: 23579739
- PMCID: PMC4872963
- DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000100005
Is there publication bias towards Brazilian articles on cancer?
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether Brazilian articles on cancer are published in journals with an impact factor and/or repercussion (measured by the number of citations) inferior to those that come from foreign organizations.
Methods: A search was carried out in PubMed for the MeSH term "neoplasm" with the limits clinical trial, affiliation of the Brazilian author(s), and interval from July 1st, 2009 to June 30, 2010. Selected for matching were non-Brazilian related articles published from three months prior to three months after the date of publication of the Brazilian study. The numbers of citations were obtained from two databases, as well as the impact factor for the journals in which the articles were published.
Results: Forty-three national and 876 related international articles were identified. The Brazilian publications had a mean impact factor of 3.000 versus 3.430 of the international ones (p=0.041). There was no statistically significant difference as to the number of citations between the two groups. The affiliation of the first author with a Brazilian or foreign organization did not significantly influence the number of citations or the impact factor.
Conclusion: Brazilian articles are significantly less accepted in journals with higher impact factors, although it does not compromise its repercussion on the scientific community.
Objetivo:: Investigar se artigos brasileiros sobre câncer são publicados em periódicos de fator impacto e/ou repercussão (medida pelo número de citações) inferiores aos oriundos de instituições estrangeiras
Métodos:: Pesquisou-se, no PubMed, o MeSH Term “neoplasm” com os limitadores: clinical trial, afiliação de autor(es) brasileira e intervalo de 1° de julho de 2009 a 30 de junho de 2010. Foram selecionados para pareamento artigos relacionados, não brasileiros, publicados entre três meses antes e três meses depois da data de publicação do estudo brasileiro. Foram obtidos os números de citações, em duas bases de dados, assim como o fator de impacto para as revistas nas quais os artigos foram publicados.
Resultados:: Identificaram-se 43 artigos nacionais e 876 internacionais relacionados. Os brasileiros apresentaram fator de impacto médio de 3.000 contra 3.430 dos internacionais (p=0,041). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa quanto ao número de citações entre os grupos. A afiliação do primeiro autor à instituição brasileira ou estrangeira também não influenciou significativamente no número de citações nem no fator de impacto.
Conclusão:: Artigos brasileiros são significativamente menos aceitos em revistas de maior impacto sem aparente comprometimento de sua repercussão na comunidade científica.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: none.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Publication in a Brazilian journal by Brazilian scientists whose papers have international impact.Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010 Sep;43(9):812-5. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500073. Epub 2010 Jul 30. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010. PMID: 20838753
-
Articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions published from 1994 to 2003 with 100 or more citations: I - the weight of international collaboration and the role of the networks.An Acad Bras Cienc. 2006 Dec;78(4):841-53. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652006000400017. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2006. PMID: 17143417
-
References from Brazilian medical journals in national publications.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2013 Nov-Dec;59(6):571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ramb.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2013. PMID: 24211012 English, Portuguese.
-
Brazilian knowledge production in the field of child and adolescent health.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006 Mar-Apr;82(2):97-102. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1454. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006. PMID: 16614762 Review.
-
A review of recent pediatric research published in Brazilian indexed journals.Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(5):318-29. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000500009. Sao Paulo Med J. 2012. Retraction in: Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(5):365. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802013000500014. PMID: 23174872 Free PMC article. Retracted. Review.
Cited by
-
The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Sep 18;69(9):e20230560. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230560. eCollection 2023. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023. PMID: 37729376 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cruz CH. Brazil: Reward quality. Nature. 2012;490:334–334.
-
- Zorzetto R, Razzouk D, Dubugras MT, Gerolin J, Schor N, Guimarães JA, et al. The scientific production in health and biological sciences of the top 20 Brazilian universities. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(12):1513–1522. - PubMed
-
- Rodrigues PS, Fonseca L, Chaimovich H. Mapping cancer, cardiovascular and malaria research in Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33(8):853–867. - PubMed
-
- Tas F. The contribution of countries and world regions in productivity of oncological publication. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(11):1962–1968. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources