Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: a population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000-2007
- PMID: 23581611
- DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.764008
Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: a population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000-2007
Abstract
Background: Large international differences in colorectal cancer survival exist, even between countries with similar healthcare. We investigate the extent to which stage at diagnosis explains these differences.
Methods: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK were analysed for 313 852 patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer during 2000-2007. We compared the distributions of stage at diagnosis. We estimated both stage-specific net survival and the excess hazard of death up to three years after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log-cumulative excess hazard scale.
Results: International differences in colon and rectal cancer stage distributions were wide: Denmark showed a distribution skewed towards later-stage disease, while Australia, Norway and the UK showed high proportions of 'regional' disease. One-year colon cancer survival was 67% in the UK and ranged between 71% (Denmark) and 80% (Australia and Sweden) elsewhere. For rectal cancer, one-year survival was also low in the UK (75%), compared to 79% in Denmark and 82-84% elsewhere. International survival differences were also evident for each stage of disease, with the UK showing consistently lowest survival at one and three years.
Conclusion: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international differences in colorectal cancer survival, with a more adverse stage distribution contributing to comparatively low survival in Denmark. Differences in stage distribution could arise because of differences in diagnostic delay and awareness of symptoms, or in the thoroughness of staging procedures. Nevertheless, survival differences also exist for each stage of disease, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment, particularly in the UK.
Comment in
-
Misinterpretation of the origins and composition of staging data and its impact on colorectal cancer survival.Acta Oncol. 2014 Jun;53(6):845-6. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.875217. Epub 2014 Jan 17. Acta Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24438659 No abstract available.
-
Optimal use of staging data in international comparisons of colorectal cancer survival.Acta Oncol. 2014 Jun;53(6):847-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.874574. Epub 2014 Jan 17. Acta Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24438660 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004-2007.Thorax. 2013 Jun;68(6):551-64. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297. Epub 2013 Feb 11. Thorax. 2013. PMID: 23399908
-
Surgical treatment and survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark, England, Norway, and Sweden: a population-based study.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):74-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30646-6. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30545752 Free PMC article.
-
Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Gynecol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22750127
-
Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21183212 Free PMC article.
-
Paediatric cancer stage in population-based cancer registries: the Toronto consensus principles and guidelines.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):e163-e172. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00539-2. Epub 2016 Mar 29. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27300676 Review.
Cited by
-
Associations between disrupted functional brain network topology and cognitive impairment in patients with rectal cancer during chemotherapy.Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 24;12:927771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927771. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36505777 Free PMC article.
-
The Prediction of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using Machine Learning.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;10(8):1425. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081425. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36011082 Free PMC article.
-
Meeting report from the joint IARC-NCI international cancer seminar series: a focus on colorectal cancer.Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):510-519. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz044. Ann Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30721924 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinical Stage II to III Across European Countries: Variations and Outcomes.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Mar;17(1):e129-e142. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29074354 Free PMC article.
-
Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD011134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011134.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26661580 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical