Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology)
- PMID: 23583249
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.035
Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology)
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients ineligible for warfarin therapy.
Background: The PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial demonstrated that LAA closure with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) was noninferior to warfarin therapy. However, the PROTECT AF trial only included patients who were candidates for warfarin, and even patients randomly assigned to the LAA closure arm received concomitant warfarin for 6 weeks after Watchman implantation.
Methods: A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted of LAA closure with the Watchman device in 150 patients with nonvalvular AF and CHADS₂ (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack) score ≥1, who were considered ineligible for warfarin. The primary efficacy endpoint was the combined events of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular/unexplained death.
Results: The mean CHADS₂ score and CHA₂DS₂-VASc (CHADS₂ score plus 2 points for age ≥75 years and 1 point for vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, or female sex) score were 2.8 ± 1.2 and 4.4 ± 1.7, respectively. History of hemorrhagic/bleeding tendencies (93%) was the most common reason for warfarin ineligibility. Mean duration of follow-up was 14.4 ± 8.6 months. Serious procedure- or device-related safety events occurred in 8.7% of patients (13 of 150 patients). All-cause stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 4 patients (2.3% per year): ischemic stroke in 3 patients (1.7% per year) and hemorrhagic stroke in 1 patient (0.6% per year). This ischemic stroke rate was less than that expected (7.3% per year) based on the CHADS₂ scores of the patient cohort.
Conclusions: LAA closure with the Watchman device can be safely performed without a warfarin transition, and is a reasonable alternative to consider for patients at high risk for stroke but with contraindications to systemic oral anticoagulation. (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology [ASAP]; NCT00851578).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24998121 Clinical Trial.
-
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.004. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 31171282
-
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial.Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):720-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389. Epub 2013 Jan 16. Circulation. 2013. PMID: 23325525 Clinical Trial.
-
Left atrial appendage exclusion for stroke prevention in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2 Suppl):624-30. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000250166.06949.95. Stroke. 2007. PMID: 17261703 Review.
-
Prospective randomized evaluation of the watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: The PREVAIL trial.Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:177-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Jun 15. Int J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27343417 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation: managing the left atrial appendage.Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:304626. doi: 10.1155/2012/304626. Epub 2012 May 15. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 22666618 Free PMC article.
-
Left atrial appendage occlusion: are we ready for prime time?Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae187. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae187. Europace. 2024. PMID: 39082729 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
LAA occlusion is effective and safe in very high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke: results from the multicentre German LAARGE registry.Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct;113(10):1451-1462. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02376-8. Epub 2024 Jan 31. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38294498 Free PMC article.
-
Anticoagulation of Cardiovascular Conditions in the Cancer Patient: Review of Old and New Therapies.Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Apr 4;21(5):45. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0797-z. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30949848 Review.
-
Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal.Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9):euad226. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad226. Europace. 2023. PMID: 37622590 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical