Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference
- PMID: 23583356
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.057
Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference
Abstract
I would like to thank Michael Ingre, Martin Lindquist and their co-authors for their thoughtful responses to my ironic Comments and Controversies piece. I was of two minds about whether to accept the invitation to reply - largely because I was convinced by most of their observations. I concluded that I should say this explicitly, taking the opportunity to consolidate points of consensus and highlight outstanding issues.
Keywords: Confidence intervals; Effect size; Inference; Sample size.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 1;116:248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Apr 25. Neuroimage. 2015. PMID: 25918034 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 22521475 Review.
-
Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012).Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:496-498. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23583358
-
Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23587691 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
