Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Aug;191(2):118-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

Comparison of four multiplex PCR assays for the detection of viral pathogens in respiratory specimens

Trevor P Anderson  1 , Anja M Werno, Kevin Barratt, Patalee Mahagamasekera, David R Murdoch, Lance C Jennings
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of four multiplex PCR assays for the detection of viral pathogens in respiratory specimens

Trevor P Anderson et al. J Virol Methods. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Multiplex PCR has become the test of choice for the detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens. However, there are few direct comparisons of different PCR assays. This study compares 4 different multiplex PCR assays for the recovery of common respiratory viruses. We tested 213 respiratory specimens using four different multiplex PCR assays: the xTAG respiratory viral panel fast (Abbott Molecular Laboratories), Fast-track Respiratory Pathogen assay (Fast-track Diagnostics), Easyplex respiratory pathogen 12 kit (Ausdiagnostics), and an in-house multiplex real-time PCR assay. The performance of the four assays was very similar, with 93-100% agreement for all comparisons. Other issues, such as through-put, technical requirements and cost, are likely to be as important for making a decision about which of these assays to use given their comparative performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bellau-Pujol S., Vabret A., Legrand L., Dina J., Gouarin S., Petitjean-Lecherbonnier J., Pozzetto B., Ginevra C., Freymuth F. Development of three multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of 12 respiratory RNA viruses. J. Virol. Methods. 2005;126:53–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominguez S.R., Briese T., Palacios G., Hui J., Villari J., Kapoor V., Tokarz R., Glode M.P., Anderson M.S., Robinson C.C., Holmes K.V., Lipkin W.I. Multiplex MassTag-PCR for respiratory pathogens in pediatric nasopharyngeal washes negative by conventional diagnostic testing shows a high prevalence of viruses belonging to a newly recognized rhinovirus clade. J. Clin. Virol. 2008;43:219–222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faux C.E., Arden K.E., Lambert S.B., Nissen M.D., Nolan T.M., Chang A.B., Sloots T.P., Mackay I.M. Usefulness of published PCR primers in detecting human rhinovirus infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011;17:296–298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gadsby N.J., Hardie A., Claas E.C., Templeton K.E. Comparison of the Luminex Respiratory Virus Panel fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral infection diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48:2213–2216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganzenmueller T., Kluba J., Hilfrich B., Puppe W., Verhagen W., Heim A., Schulz T., Henke-Gendo C. Comparison of the performance of direct fluorescent antibody staining, a point-of-care rapid antigen test and virus isolation with that of RT-PCR for the detection of novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus in respiratory specimens. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010;59:713–717. - PubMed

MeSH terms