Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 15:13:342.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-342.

Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe

Morten Skovdal  1 , Phyllis Mushati, Laura Robertson, Shungu Munyati, Lorraine Sherr, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson
Affiliations

Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe

Morten Skovdal et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Cash transfer programmes are increasingly recognised as promising and scalable interventions that can promote the health and development of children. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for cash transfers to contribute to social division, jealousy and conflict at a community level. Against this background, and in our interest to promote community participation in cash transfer programmes, we examine local perceptions of a community-led cash transfer programme in Eastern Zimbabwe.

Methods: We collected and analysed data from 35 individual interviews and three focus group discussions, involving 24 key informants (community committee members and programme implementers), 24 cash transfer beneficiaries, of which four were youth, and 14 non-beneficiaries. Transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis and coding to generate concepts.

Results: Study participants described the programme as participatory, fair and transparent - reducing the likelihood of jealousy. The programme was perceived to have had a substantial impact on children's health and education, primarily through aiding parents and guardians to better cater for their children's needs. Moreover, participants alluded to the potential of the programme to facilitate more transformational change, for example by enabling families to invest money in assets and income generating activities and by promoting a community-wide sense of responsibility for the support of orphaned and vulnerable children.

Conclusion: Community participation, combined with the perceived impact of the cash transfer programme, led community members to speak enthusiastically about the programme. We conclude that community-led cash transfer programmes have the potential to open up for possibilities of participation and community agency that enable social acceptability and limit social divisiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Standing G. How cash transfers promote the case for basic income. Basic Income Stud. 2008;3(1):1–30.
    1. Hanlon J, Barrientos A, Hulme D. Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2010.
    1. Attanasio O, Fitzsimons E, Gomez A, Gutierrez MI. Children's schooling and work in the presence of a conditional cash transfer program in Rural Colombia. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2010;58(2):181–210. doi: 10.1086/648188. - DOI
    1. Fernald LCH, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. 10-year effect of oportunidades, Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme, on child growth, cognition, language, and behaviour: a longitudinal follow-up study (vol 374, pg 1997, 2009) Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1828–1828. - PubMed
    1. Fernald LCH, Hidrobo M. Effect of Ecuador’s cash transfer program (Bono de Desarrollo Humano) on child development in infants and toddlers: A randomized effectiveness trial. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(9):1437–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.005. - DOI - PubMed