Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Apr;7(2):107-13.
doi: 10.1007/BF01135584.

Development of two-cell mouse embryos in protein-free and protein-supplemented media

Affiliations

Development of two-cell mouse embryos in protein-free and protein-supplemented media

P V Dandekar et al. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990 Apr.

Abstract

Two-cell mouse embryos from CFW (Swiss-Webster) mice were cultured to the blastocyst stage in Ham's F10, Whittingham's T6, or human tubal fluid medium. Media were used without any protein supplements or were supplemented with human maternal serum, human fetal cord serum, or human serum albumin. Blastocysts were transferred to modified Eagle's basal medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum for postblastocyst development. Blastocyst and postblastocyst development was depressed among embryos cultured during the preimplantation stage in protein-free Whittingham's T6 and human tubal fluid media compared with embryos cultured in protein-free Ham's F10 medium. This advantage of Ham's F10 disappeared when amino acids and vitamins were added to the other two media. Whittingham's T6 and human tubal fluid supplemented with human serum albumin, human maternal serum, or human fetal cord serum also supported excellent embryo development. When supplemented with protein, Ham's F10 was the poorest of the media in supporting embryo development. Although these results suggest that Ham's F10 is not the best medium for culture of mouse embryos, there is need for caution in extrapolating results from the mouse to the human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biol Reprod. 1988 Dec;39(5):1137-43 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jan;49(1):150-5 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Aug;22(3):553-5 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1987 Jan;47(1):156-61 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Zool. 1973 Dec;186(3):305-18 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources