Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-8.

Tissue sampling methods and standards for vertebrate genomics

Affiliations

Tissue sampling methods and standards for vertebrate genomics

Pamela By Wong et al. Gigascience. .

Abstract

The recent rise in speed and efficiency of new sequencing technologies have facilitated high-throughput sequencing, assembly and analyses of genomes, advancing ongoing efforts to analyze genetic sequences across major vertebrate groups. Standardized procedures in acquiring high quality DNA and RNA and establishing cell lines from target species will facilitate these initiatives. We provide a legal and methodological guide according to four standards of acquiring and storing tissue for the Genome 10K Project and similar initiatives as follows: four-star (banked tissue/cell cultures, RNA from multiple types of tissue for transcriptomes, and sufficient flash-frozen tissue for 1 mg of DNA, all from a single individual); three-star (RNA as above and frozen tissue for 1 mg of DNA); two-star (frozen tissue for at least 700 μg of DNA); and one-star (ethanol-preserved tissue for 700 μg of DNA or less of mixed quality). At a minimum, all tissues collected for the Genome 10K and other genomic projects should consider each species' natural history and follow institutional and legal requirements. Associated documentation should detail as much information as possible about provenance to ensure representative sampling and subsequent sequencing. Hopefully, the procedures outlined here will not only encourage success in the Genome 10K Project but also inspire the adaptation of standards by other genomic projects, including those involving other biota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Considerations (dotted), potential permit requirements (gray) and procedures (bold) in acquiring Genome 10 K materials (highlighted). Document as much information as possible on permits, sampling events, species identification, and voucher locations.

References

    1. Schwartz MK, Luikart G, McKelvey KS, Cushman SA. In: Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Cushman SA, Huettmann F, editor. Springer, New York; 2009. Landscape genomics: a brief perspective; pp. 165–174.
    1. Gayral P, Weinert L, Chiari Y, Tsagkogeorga G, Ballenghien M, Galtier N. Next-generation sequencing of transcriptomes: a guide to RNA isolation in nonmodel animals. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:650–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03010.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glenn TC. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:759–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03024.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Genome 10 K Community of Scientists. Genome 10 K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10 000 vertebrate species. J Hered. 2009;100:659–674. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadeau NK, Jiggins CD. A golden age for evolutionary genetics? Genomic studies of adaptation in natural populations. TIG. 2010;26:484–492. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.004. - DOI - PubMed