Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 12:8:81.
doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-81.

Mitral valve reoperation under ventricular fibrillation through right mini-thoracotomy using three-dimensional videoscope

Affiliations

Mitral valve reoperation under ventricular fibrillation through right mini-thoracotomy using three-dimensional videoscope

Arudo Hiraoka et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Conventional reoperative mitral valve surgery by median sternotomy has several difficulties. We performed mitral valve replacement (MVR) under ventricular fibrillation (VF) through right mini-thoracotomy with three-dimensional videoscope for avoiding the problems.

Methods: Between 2006 and 2011, we performed 257 cases of MVR, in which 125 cases underwent isolated MVR. Ten cases of patients underwent reoperative MVR under VF through thoracotomy with three-dimensional videoscope (Group I), and 27 cases of patients underwent reoperative conventional MVR through median sternotomy (Group II). We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes and compared Group I with Group II. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower (50.5 ± 19.8% vs 64.4 ± 12.0%; p = 0.046), and significantly higher Euro SCORE was found in Group I (4.8 ± 2.0 vs 3.8 ± 2.4; p = 0.037).

Results: Although Group I required cooling and rewarming time, average operative times was significantly shorter in Group I (262 ± 46 min vs 300 ± 57 min; p = 0.044), and cardiopulmonary bypass times and average VF times in Group I and aortic cross-clamp times in Group II were equivalent. There was no significant difference in the average of postoperative maximum creatine kinase (CK)-MB. In-hospital mortality was 0/10 (0%) and 1/27 (3.7%), and postoperative paravalvular leakage occurred in 0/10 (0%) and 1/27 (3.7%), and stroke occurred in 1/10 (10%) and 1/27 (3.7%) for Groups I and II. Two patients underwent reoperation for bleeding in Group II. Intensive care unit stay in Group I was significantly shorter than in Group II (1.8 ± 0.6 days vs 3.0 ± 1.7 days; p = 0.025).

Conclusions: The higher risk of preoperative background in Group I had no effect on the operation. Mitral valve surgery under VF through right mini-thoracotomy can be an alternative procedure for reoperation after conventional various cardiothoracic surgeries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohn LH, Peigh PS, Sell J, DiSesa VJ. Right thoracotomy, femorofemoral bypass, and deep hypothermia for rereplacement of the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:69–71. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90180-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, Cohn LH. Mitral valve surgery after previous CABG with functioning IMA grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2243–2247. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01120-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Imanaka K, Kyo S, Ogiwara M, Tanabe H, Ohuchi H, Asano H, Yokote Y, Gojo S, Kato M. Mitral valve surgery under perfused ventricular fibrillation with moderate hypothermia. Circ J. 2002;66:450–452. doi: 10.1253/circj.66.450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steimle CN, Bolling SF. Outcome of reoperative valve surgery via right thoracotomy. Circulation. 1996;94(Supp II):II126. - PubMed
    1. Ricci D, Pellegrini C, Aiello M, Alloni A, Cattadori B, D'Armini AM, Rinaldi M, Viganò M. Port-access surgery as elective approach for mitral valve operation in re-do procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:920–925. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.10.011. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms