Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules"
- PMID: 23587691
- PMCID: PMC3730443
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056
Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules"
Abstract
The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference.Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:503-504. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.057. Epub 2013 Apr 11. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23583356
-
Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 1;116:248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Apr 25. Neuroimage. 2015. PMID: 25918034 Free PMC article.
Comment on
-
Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers.Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID: 22521475 Review.
References
-
- Bernardo JM, Smith AFM. Bayesian Theory. John Wiley & Sons; Chichester, UK: 2000.
-
- Breiman L. Statistical modeling: The two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) Statistical Science. 2001;16(3):199–231.
-
- Casella G, Berger R. Statistical inference. Duxbury Press; 2001.
-
- Friston K. Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers. NeuroImage. 2012 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
