Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Dec;28(12):1239-50.
doi: 10.1002/gps.3949. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

Performance of a computer-based assessment of cognitive function measures in two cohorts of seniors

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Performance of a computer-based assessment of cognitive function measures in two cohorts of seniors

Mark A Espeland et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Computer-administered assessment of cognitive function is being increasingly incorporated in clinical trials; however, its performance in these settings has not been systematically evaluated.

Design: The Seniors Health and Activity Research Program pilot trial (N = 73) developed a computer-based tool for assessing memory performance and executive functioning. The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders investigators incorporated this battery in a full-scale multicenter clinical trial (N = 1635). We describe relationships that test scores have with those from interviewer-administered cognitive function tests and risk factors for cognitive deficits and describe performance measures (completeness, intraclass correlations [ICC]).

Results: Computer-based assessments of cognitive function had consistent relationships across the pilot and full-scale trial cohorts with interviewer-administered assessments of cognitive function, age, and a measure of physical function. In the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders cohort, their external validity was further demonstrated by associations with other risk factors for cognitive dysfunction: education, hypertension, diabetes, and physical function. Acceptable levels of data completeness (>83%) were achieved on all computer-based measures; however, rates of missing data were higher among older participants (odds ratio = 1.06 for each additional year; p < 0.001) and those who reported no current computer use (odds ratio = 2.71; p < 0.001). ICCs among clinics were at least as low (ICC < 0.013) as for interviewer measures (ICC < 0.023), reflecting good standardization. All cognitive measures loaded onto the first principal component (global cognitive function), which accounted for 40% of the overall variance.

Conclusion: Our results support the use of computer-based tools for assessing cognitive function in multicenter clinical trials of older individuals.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00688155 NCT01072500.

Keywords: clinical trial; cognitive function; performance measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation coefficients linking computer-administered test scores to interviewer-administered tests, age, and 400 meter walk times in SHARP versus LIFE.

References

    1. American Psychological Association . Guidelines for computer based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: 1987.
    1. Awh E, Jonides J, Smith EE, Schumacher EF, Koepee RA, Katz S. Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: evidence from positron emission tomography. Psychol Sci. 1996;7:25–31.
    1. Becker JT, Dew MA, Aizenstein HJ, Lopez OL, Morrow L, Saxton J. Concurrent validity of a computer-based cognitive screening tool for use in adults with HIV disease. AIRD Pat Care. 2011;25 DOI:10.1089/apc.2011.0051. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandt J. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsych. 1991;5:125–142.
    1. Bryan C, Hernandez AM. Magnitudes of decline on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics subtest scores related to pre-deployment baseline performance among service members evaluated for traumatic brain injury in Iraq. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27:45–54. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data