Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May 20;31(15):1815-24.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.5948. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

Existing and emerging technologies for tumor genomic profiling

Affiliations
Review

Existing and emerging technologies for tumor genomic profiling

Laura E MacConaill. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Ongoing global genome characterization efforts are revolutionizing our knowledge of cancer genomics and tumor biology. In parallel, information gleaned from these studies on driver cancer gene alterations--mutations, copy number alterations, translocations, and/or chromosomal rearrangements--an be leveraged, in principle, to develop a cohesive framework for individualized cancer treatment. These possibilities have been enabled, to a large degree, by revolutionary advances in genomic technologies that facilitate systematic profiling for hallmark cancer genetic alterations at increasingly fine resolutions. Ongoing innovations in existing genomics technologies, as well as the many emerging technologies, will likely continue to advance translational cancer genomics and precision cancer medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author's disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Categories of genomic alterations and technologies for detection. Many of the hallmark alterations in cancer are currently detected by using a multitude of existing technologies, often in a serial fashion, each using an appreciable amount of nucleic acid. Newer sequencing-based methodologies are capable of interrogating many types of cancer alterations in one composite, sensitive test. CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; ChIP-Seq, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel sequencing; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RNA-Seq, RNA sequencing, also known as transcriptome sequencing; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; Targ-Seq, targeted sequencing; WES, whole-exome sequencing; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
The decrease in cost of genome sequencing facilitated by massively parallel sequencing technologies. The cost of sequencing has decreased at a rate faster than Moore's law in the past 10 years. The data from 2001 through 2007 represent the costs of generating DNA sequences by using Sanger-based chemistries and capillary-based instruments (first-generation sequencing platforms). Starting in 2008, the data represent the costs of generating DNA sequences by using second-generation sequencing technologies. The change in instruments represents the rapid evolution of DNA sequencing technologies that has occurred in recent years. Landmark events are also indicated on the timeline. The release of various second- and third-generation technologies is indicated in blue boxes. IHGSC, International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Data adapted from the National Human Genome Research Institute Web site.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Existing and emerging sequencing technologies. Comparison of the generations of sequencing technologies, illustrating the similarities and differences in methodologies and some sequencing characteristics. PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

References

    1. de Klein A, van Kessel AG, Grosveld G, et al. A cellular oncogene is translocated to the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1982;300:765–767. - PubMed
    1. Rowley JD. Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature. 1973;243:290–293. - PubMed
    1. Cohen Y, Xing M, Mambo E, et al. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:625–627. - PubMed
    1. Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455:1069–1075. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacConaill LE, Campbell CD, Kehoe SM, et al. Profiling critical cancer gene mutations in clinical tumor samples. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7887. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources