Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Aug;78(2):312-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Apr 13.

Comparison of the utility of covered metal stents versus uncovered metal stents in the management of malignant biliary strictures in 749 patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

Comparison of the utility of covered metal stents versus uncovered metal stents in the management of malignant biliary strictures in 749 patients

Jeffrey H Lee et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are used to relieve malignant biliary obstruction.

Objective: To compare outcomes between covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) in malignant biliary obstruction.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary cancer center.

Patients: Patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Interventions: Placement of CSEMS or USEMS.

Main outcome measurements: Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRO), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.

Results: From January 2000 to June 2011, 749 patients received SEMSs: 171 CSEMSs and 578 USEMSs. At 1 year, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with recurrent obstruction (CSEMSs, 35% vs USEMSs, 38%) and survival (CSEMSs, 45% vs USEMSs, 49%). There was no significant difference in the median OS (CSEMSs, 10.4 months vs USEMSs, 11.8 months; P = .84) and the median TRO (CSEMSs, 15.4 months vs USEMSs, 26.3 months; P = .61). The adverse event rate was 27.5% for the CSEMS group and 27.7% for the USEMS group. Although tumor ingrowth with recurrent obstruction was more common in the USEMS group (76% vs 9%, P < .001), stent migration (36% vs 2%, P < .001) and acute pancreatitis (6% vs 1%, P < .001) were more common in the CSEMS group.

Limitations: Retrospective study.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the patency rate or overall survival between CSEMSs and USEMSs for malignant distal biliary strictures. The CSEMS group had a significantly higher rate of migration and pancreatitis than the USEMS group. No significant SEMS-related adverse events were observed in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation or surgical resection.

Keywords: CSEMS; OS; ROFS; SE; SEMS; TRO; USEMS; covered self-expandable metal stent; overall survival; recurrent obstruction–free survival; self-expandable metal stent; standard error; time to recurrent biliary obstruction; uncovered self-expandable metal stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources