[Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging]
- PMID: 23592011
- DOI: 10.1007/s00117-012-2344-x
[Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging]
Abstract
Clinical/methodical issue: The spatial, temporal and spectral resolution in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is in many cases currently not sufficient to detect submillimeter lesions or to image the dynamics of the beating heart.
Standard radiological methods: At present MRI systems at 1.5 T and 3 T are the standard units for clinical imaging.
Methodical innovations: The use of ultrahigh magnetic fields of 7 T and higher increases the signal-to-noise ratio, which holds promise for a significant improvement of the spatial and/or temporal resolution as well as for new contrast mechanisms.
Performance: With 7 T MRI, images of the brain have been acquired routinely with a spatial resolution of 0.3 mm. The theoretical improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio is often not fully realized due to B1 inhomogeneities and contrast variations.
Achievements: With MRI at 7 T a notable increase in spatial resolution can be achieved. Methods such as time-of-flight MR angiography and susceptibility-weighted imaging (e.g. neurofunctional MRI, fMRI) profit especially from the higher field strengths. Transmission field inhomogeneities are still a major challenge for ultrahigh field (UHF) MRI and are also a partially unsolved safety problem.
Practical recommendations: The use of UHF MRI is currently limited to special applications and the expected gain of the high field must be weighed against technical limitations in both image acquisition and interpretation.
Similar articles
-
[Cardiovascular ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging : challenges, technical solutions and opportunities].Radiologe. 2013 May;53(5):422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00117-012-2348-6. Radiologe. 2013. PMID: 23613023 German.
-
[Neurofunctional MRI at high magnetic fields].Radiologe. 2013 May;53(5):415-21. doi: 10.1007/s00117-012-2345-9. Radiologe. 2013. PMID: 23613021 German.
-
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast tumors at 3 and 7 T: a comparison.Invest Radiol. 2014 May;49(5):354-62. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000034. Invest Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24619208
-
Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises.Eur Radiol. 2010 Dec;20(12):2806-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1902-8. Epub 2010 Jul 31. Eur Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20676653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical applications at ultrahigh field (7 T). Where does it make the difference?NMR Biomed. 2016 Sep;29(9):1316-34. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3272. Epub 2015 Mar 12. NMR Biomed. 2016. PMID: 25762432 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of aortic valve planimetry at 7 T ultrahigh field MRI: Comparison to aortic valve MRI at 3 T and 1.5 T.Eur J Radiol Open. 2018 Sep 11;5:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.08.008. eCollection 2018. Eur J Radiol Open. 2018. PMID: 30225274 Free PMC article.
-
Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2488-95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4146-0. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26206293
-
Experience with magnetic resonance imaging of human subjects with passive implants and tattoos at 7 T: a retrospective study.MAGMA. 2015 Dec;28(6):577-90. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0499-y. Epub 2015 Sep 26. MAGMA. 2015. PMID: 26410044
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical