Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 24:12:e129.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.982. Print 2012 Jul-Sep.

Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots

Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots

Tom Ling et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Background: In 2008, the English Department of Health appointed 16 'Integrated Care Pilots' which used a range of approaches to provide better integrated care. We report qualitative analyses from a three-year multi-method evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to successful integration of care.

Theory and methods: Data were analysed from transcripts of 213 in-depth staff interviews, and from semi-structured questionnaires (the 'Living Document') completed by staff in pilot sites at six points over a two-year period. Emerging findings were therefore built from 'bottom up' and grounded in the data. However, we were then interested in how these findings compared and contrasted with more generic analyses. Therefore after our analyses were complete we then systematically compared and contrasted the findings with the analysis of barriers and facilitators to quality improvement identified in a systematic review by Kaplan et al. (2010) and the analysis of more micro-level shapers of behaviour found in Normalisation Process Theory (May et al. 2007). Neither of these approaches claims to be full blown theories but both claim to provide mid-range theoretical arguments which may be used to structure existing data and which can be undercut or reinforced by new data.

Results and discussion: Many barriers and facilitators to integrating care are those of any large-scale organisational change. These include issues relating to leadership, organisational culture, information technology, physician involvement, and availability of resources. However, activities which appear particularly important for delivering integrated care include personal relationships between leaders in different organisations, the scale of planned activities, governance and finance arrangements, support for staff in new roles, and organisational and staff stability. We illustrate our analyses with a 'routemap' which identifies questions that providers may wish to consider when planning interventions to improve the integration of care.

Keywords: England; barriers; facilitators; integrated care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Route-map to Integrated Care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, Hofman KJ. The global burden of chronic diseases. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(21):2616–22. - PubMed
    1. Glasby J, Dickinson H, Peck E. Partnership working in health and social care. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2006;14(5):373–4. - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288(14):1775–9. - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288(15):1909–14. - PubMed
    1. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education; 2008.

LinkOut - more resources