Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Aug;28(8):986-93.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2391-7.

Effect of a systems intervention on the quality and safety of patient handoffs in an internal medicine residency program

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of a systems intervention on the quality and safety of patient handoffs in an internal medicine residency program

Kelly L Graham et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Poor quality handoffs have been identified as a major patient safety issue. In residency programs, problematic handoffs may be an unintended consequence of duty-hour restrictions, and key data are frequently omitted from written handoffs because of the lack of standardization of content.

Objective: Determine whether an intervention that facilitates face-to-face communication supported by an electronic template improves the quality and safety of handoffs.

Design: Before-after trial.

Participants: Thirty-nine interns providing nighttime coverage over 132 intern shifts, representing ∼9,200 handoffs.

Interventions: Two interventions were implemented serially-an alteration of the shift model to facilitate face-to-face verbal communication between the primary and nighttime covering physicians and an electronic template for the day-to-night handoff.

Measurements: Overall satisfaction and handoff quality were measured using a survey tool administered at the end of each intern shift. Written handoff quality, specifically the documentation of key components, was also assessed before and after the template intervention by study investigators. Interns used the survey tool to report patient safety events related to poor quality handoffs, which were validated by study investigators.

Results: In adjusted analyses comparing intern cohorts with similar levels of training, overall satisfaction with the new handoff processes improved significantly (p < 0.001) post intervention. Verbal handoff quality (4/10 measures) and written handoff quality (5/6 measures) also improved significantly. Study investigators also found significant improvement in documentation of key components in the written handoff. Interns reported significantly fewer reported data omissions (p = 0.001) and a non-significant reduction in near misses (p = 0.056), but no significant difference in adverse events (p = 0.41) post intervention.

Conclusions: Redesign of shift models common in residency programs to minimize the number of handoffs and facilitate face-to-face communication, along with implementation of electronic handoff templates, improves the quality of handoffs in a learning environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The written sign-out template before (a) and after (b) the electronic template intervention. Displayed here is the electronic documentation system, which links to the provider order entry system and the hospital’s online medical record (webOMR); see the upper right corner of a and b for the location of these links. The larger text boxes featured at the top of a and b are where the teams keep their admission history and physicals for the patient, and the smaller text boxes at the bottom are where the teams document their written sign-outs. Before the intervention, the template was very simple, with the subheading “To do” for each text box. After the intervention, the template subheadings are specific, directing learners about what type of information should be documented in the sign-out.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing of data collection periods and interventions over two academic years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257–266. doi: 10.1002/jhm.103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):401–407. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1755–1760. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, Rich EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(6):501–505. doi: 10.1007/BF02600880. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson JK, Arora VM. Improving clinical handovers: creating local solutions for a global problem. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):244–245. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032946. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources