Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with electromyography in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
- PMID: 23596492
- PMCID: PMC3627454
- DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.934
Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with electromyography in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the value of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with electromyography (EMG) for predicting clinical outcome following surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). A total of 94 patients with cervical compressive myelopathy were prospectively enrolled and treated with anterior, posterior and posterior-anterior united decompression between October 2007 and February 2009. Prior to surgery 1.5-T MRI and EMG were performed in all patients. The patients were classified into four types based on the presence (+) or absence (-) of an increased signal intensity (ISI) on the T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images and also based on the positive (+)/negative (-) results of the EMG. The four types were as follows: Type I, MRI/EMG (-/-); Type II, MRI/EMG (+/-); Type III, MRI/EMG (-/+); and Type IV, MRI/EMG (+/+). The clinical outcome was also graded according to a modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Furthermore, pre- and post-operative clinical data were statistically analyzed to explore the correlation between the factors. There were 36 cases (38%) of Type I, 16 (17%) of Type II, 13 (14%) of Type III and 29 (31%) of Type IV. According to the analysis of the clinical data between the four types, there were significant differences in the disability classifications, pre-operative JOA scores and disease duration (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in gender, age or cord compression ratios (P>0.05). Until the final follow-up, there was a significant difference in the recovery ratio between the four study groups (Hc=27.46, P<0.05). Further comparison showed that the surgical outcome was best in Type I patients and worst in Type IV patients. In conclusion, there was a distinct correlation between classification and the rate of clinical improvement. Patients who had a negative EMG and those without an ISI on T2-weight images tended to suffer only mild symptoms, a short disease duration and, most significantly, experience a good surgical outcome.
Keywords: cervical spondylotic myelopathy; electromyography; magnetic resonance imaging; prognosis.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic value of changes in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24411833
-
Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25637468
-
The evolution of T2-weighted intramedullary signal changes following ventral decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Clinical article.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):538-46. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13727. Epub 2014 Jul 11. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 25014501
-
Does three-grade classification of T2-weighted increased signal intensity reflect the severity of myelopathy and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Jun;43(3):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01106-3. Epub 2019 May 3. Neurosurg Rev. 2020. PMID: 31053986
-
Snake-Eye Myelopathy and Surgical Prognosis: Case Series and Systematic Literature Review.J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 12;9(7):2197. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072197. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32664657 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review.Spinal Cord. 2016 Oct;54(10):756-766. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.82. Epub 2016 May 31. Spinal Cord. 2016. PMID: 27241448 Review.
-
Brain Structural and Functional Dissociated Patterns in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Resting-State fMRI Study.Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 15;13:895348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.895348. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35785340 Free PMC article.
-
Fatty infiltration of the cervical multifidus musculature and its clinical correlation to cervical spondylosis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 27;24(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06595-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37501110 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic and Static Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation Is a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Prognosis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Patients: A Preliminary Resting-State fMRI Study.Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 4;13:829714. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.829714. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35444605 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and Therapeutic Outcome Prediction of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Based on the Functional Connectivity From Resting-State Functional MRI Data: A Preliminary Machine Learning Study.Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 8;12:711880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.711880. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34690912 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K. Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1140–1149. - PubMed
-
- Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K. MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1675–1679. - PubMed
-
- Shen HX, Li L, Yang ZG, Hou TS. Position of increased signal intensity in the spinal cord on MR images: does it predict the outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Chin Med J (Engl) 2009;122:1418–1422. - PubMed
-
- Lo YL. How has electrophysiology changed the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:781–786. - PubMed
-
- Barkhaus PE, Nandedkar SD. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive? Muscle Nerve. 1996;19:1554–1560. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources